No just one I pay towards indirectly. Would be a nice station car as opposed to a 1.25 fez![]()
You pay renault?
No just one I pay towards indirectly. Would be a nice station car as opposed to a 1.25 fez![]()
12,000 worth of tax payers money for 3 minutes of "entertainement".
Good value? You happy with that?
12,000 worth of tax payers money for 3 minutes of "entertainement".
Good value? You happy with that?
divide 12000 by the amount of viewers...and that is how much each person paid individually.
Probably fractions of a penny![]()
Wheres that from?
Don't forget the cost (to the tax payer) of the 4 Chevy Lacetti's Guy Ritchie trashed !!!!12,000 worth of tax payers money for 3 minutes of "entertainement".
Good value? You happy with that?
4m people viewing = £0.003p
Don't forget the cost (to the tax payer) of the 4 Chevy Lacetti's Guy Ritchie trashed !!!!
![]()
do you not pay to see films![]()
I hate this perception that EVERYTHING that is on ANY BBC program on ANY BBC channel is funded ENTIRELY by the TV Licence and that they therefore have some say over it...
Joshy in being miserable TOTAL NON SHOCKER.
No just one I pay towards indirectly. Would be a nice station car as opposed to a 1.25 fez![]()
Well, not exactly. I think you need to educate yourself a little as to what the BBC's remit allows it to do with regard to cash generation. There's a big difference between the BBC as we know it and BBC Worldwide which is allowed to turn a profit as it's not funded by the UK taxpayer.[TW]Fox;15473468 said:You don't pay towards it, TG is a profitable show. It is sold all around the world and generates millions for the BBC.