Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)

The list is endless, I’ve seen selections code own by one company, re-used and hacked by another company.
thats different.


It’s typically referred to as clean-room reverse engineering (also known as a clean-room design). In essence, one group studies the target system and writes a specification or functional description,
whilst a completely separate team—who hasn’t seen the original code or designs—implements a new version based solely on that specification.
This approach is often used to avoid copyright infringement claims when recreating or emulating a proprietary product.
 
Last edited:
thats different.


It’s typically referred to as clean-room reverse engineering (also known as a clean-room design). In essence, one group studies the target system and writes a specification or functional description,
whilst a completely separate team—who hasn’t seen the original code or designs—implements a new version based solely on that specification.
This approach is often used to avoid copyright infringement claims when recreating or emulating a proprietary product.
Nope... blatantly copy and paste of code and functions..

just that most people remember to remove the legal agreement containing the other companies names.. as long as it's not commercial used and only used internally, the orginal company don't get sight of the infringement and even if they do; by the time the legal teams sort it out, the code has evolved to something different.
 
trying to get my head around the intel results , bouncing around the 1 to 2 percent up mark, edit. Nearer 4 percent now , people digesting the figures.i guess
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom