Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)

RNS Number : 6329H

Rockhopper Exploration plc

01 June 2011

Embargoed: 0700hrs 1 June 2011

Rockhopper Exploration plc

("Rockhopper" or the "Company")

14/10-5 Appraisal well update

Rockhopper Exploration, the North Falkland Basin oil and gas exploration company, is pleased to provide the following update on the 14/10-5 appraisal well:

· Significant reservoir package and hydrocarbon column encountered

· Wireline log analysis indicates 93.5m (306 feet) net pay in good quality reservoir

· Average porosity greater than 20%

· Average permeability of 100-200 millidarcies (mD) and up to 1,000mD

· 79m net pay in main fan complex

· 14.5m net pay in lower fan complex

· No oil water contact observed

· Rockhopper now intends to test the well

14/10-5 was drilled 600m north of the 14/10-2 discovery well to a total depth of 2,726m (drilled depth) and was the second appraisal well on the Sea Lion feature.

The well was designed to appraise the Sea Lion main fan reservoir and investigate hydrocarbon column and reservoir distribution.

The well has been highly successful, proving a very thick, high quality reservoir package and a substantial oil column. The geological prognosis once again came in very close to prediction.

The Sea Lion reservoir sands were encountered 22m updip from the 14/10-2 discovery well at a depth of 2,378m (drilled depth). A total reservoir package of 110m (360 feet) comprising one main sand and three thinner sands was encountered with a net to gross of 91% in the main sand and 25-80% in the lower sands. The gross oil column in the main Sea Lion fan is now 125m (410 feet). MDT pressures confirm oil gradients throughout all sands.

Wireline logging indicates that reservoir quality is good, with average porosity of greater than 20% and average permeabilities of 100-200mD.

79m (259 feet) of net pay has been encountered in the main fan complex with a net to gross of 91%. 14.5m (47 feet) of pay has been encountered in the lower fan complex with a net to gross of 25-80%. The lower fan was not prognosed to be well developed at this location.

64m (210ft) of conventional core was cut and recovered through the main sand.

The Company now intends to test the well. Tests will comprise both mini DST (downhole dual packer MDT) and a fully engineered drill stem test (DST). The Company intends to perform mini DST tests on both the upper and lower fans and to perform the fully engineered DST on the upper fan only. Testing operations are anticipated to take approximately a month and a further announcement will be issued once all testing operations have been completed.

Following completion of all testing operations, Rockhopper intends to drill a further appraisal well on Sea Lion located some 4.2km to the west of the 14/10-2 discovery well. This well will be located outside the Company's "low case" area and within the Company's "mid case" area for the main fan and is also intended to penetrate the lower fan in what the Company believes will prove a more optimal location.

Sam Moody, Chief Executive, commented:

"This is an enormously encouraging result and is a testament to the quality of our technical team. The well test will be another key step on the road towards proving commerciality for the Sea Lion discovery."

Enquiries:

Rockhopper Exploration plc

Sam Moody - Chief Executive

Tel. +44 (0)20 7920 2340 (via M: Communications)

93.5m net pay!

Today will be interesting then... :cool:
 
Woohoo nice. Should see 300 plus then.

Maybe, I'd be happy if we finally close above the 50sma (238.2p) personally... Ideally a close above the 263.4p open too...

It'll gap up, so I'm watching volume to confirm a breakaway gap, and a trend reversal...

Would be nice to see the 200sma (310.4p) broken when the flowtest is complete. It's going to be a long month!
 
Last edited:
Thanks very helpful. So out of curiosity if you picked a handful of technical analysis methods like support/resistance, Fibonacci tones, trendlines, RSI etc and automated it in into some clever decision making software what kind of probability of success would you be looking at? So a black box that you pump a live data feed into and it tells youto buy/sell based on standard chart analysis maths and nothing else.

You'd have a negative expectation in most cases IMO. Chances are if you do make some money, its down to luck and whatever edge you're unwittingly exploiting won't necessarily last.

There are already software packages out there for retail investors/traders to easily implement trading strategies based on simple TA rules - lots of people try this, most of them lose money. With thousands of people already trying to apply the same TA rules to the same sets of data its fairly unlikely that you'll be able to find anything to exploit by trying to do the same thing yourself.
 
TA is an enhancement not a total solution
TA can be obvious stuff like this share has been going up every month on average. People can lose sight because it fell for 3 weeks and forget the last 11 months, put a trendline in and its a reminder.
I think many do this in their heads, weighing it up

HFT is a form of computer trading that works on equations to guess when its best to sell or hold. However the trades dont last much longer then a couple of seconds so we can see why a computer might do this best. Flash trading, this is what caused that big sell off a year ago for 10 mins

Japanese candlesticks are information. There is nothing added beyond fact, it shows highest price, lowest, the open and closing price all in 1 bar. A normal graph shows close only
Volume is also info. If 90% of the last years trades were at 100p that is where the price is most likely to return to like a magnet.



Anyway, I got flushed out on margin checks for a couple trades while AFK. :o VGM dropped a lot recently but I think they are doing the right thing, presuming they are successful then investment cost is a future positive
Sugar cane power can drop their costs by 120$ an ounce, sounds good
110p is a reasonable base, a lot of history here


The way I do things Russ is hold just trades on margin. Buy the longer term stuff in shares, I dont trust those guys completely and the market is always acting like a Richter graph.
Hate stoplosses, hence Im taking profits early possibly stupidly today

Also looked at what I could buy to replace possible sales. XEL compared to GKP should be 90p ? That was my late night look, correct or not no wonder it sold if others saw similar.
That is not a like for like reserve comparison so hopefully Im wrong and so is the market

Sold some FPM RKH. Wish I had bought even more PGM RRL they done so well
Bought more VGM (at a cheaper price then my forced sale) LLOY CAD

Thinking of XEL and almost certainly buying EO now as its just viewed so negatively but could have good news still?

Buying more LLOY if it goes to 50p I think but might opt for Barc to replace BP maybe


Jargon glossary was useful to me:
Code:
"1P" means proved reserves.

 

"2P" means proved plus probable reserves.

 

"3P" means proved plus probable plus possible reserves.  Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves and there is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus possible reserves.

 

"best estimate" is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.

 

"boe" means barrels of oil equivalent.  Boe's, derived by converting gas to oil in the ratio of five thousand eight hundred cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil, may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

 

"Core Area" means FSP and SSP.

 

"DECC" means UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.

 

"FSP" means First Stage Production in the core area of the Field.

 

"high estimate" is considered to be an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate.

 

"low estimate" is considered to be a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate.  If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate.

 

"MM" means millions.

 

"MMboe" means millions of barrels of oil equivalent.

 

"MMstb" means millions stock tank barrels.

 

"NPV10" means net present value in money of the day using a 10% forward discount rate, which values do not represent fair market value.

 

"SSP" means Second Stage Production in the core area of the Field.

As far as I'm aware, Mark Child plans to sell the company once they have reached 2million oz JORC inferred, estimated to be around the end of this year (at current rate of drilling/discovery). Production doesn't really come into it, it's all about the buyout price.


BP bid for Rockhopper

RKH.L

Emerald Carrots

I can imagion that. Why not?
They get their hands on Rockhoppers considerable bank balance, they get to develop the Sea Lion oil strike, they get to develop what the evidence increasingly points to - billions of barrels of oil in the Falklands. Surely they must be considering how to get into the Falklands now.
All IMHO.


Just read this, awesome :D


Either way, the way to view these ideas I reckon is as very bullish sentiment. That is a contrarian signal that its ok to take profits now, everyone loves this share so leave by the back door :p. I'd take at least some profit off on this reasoning.
[Check back on XEL, pretty sure people were saying this company is going to bought out. Maybe ]

Obviously that is just private investors, the real big money opinions comes in when say GKP or RKH, etc goes mainstream or even makes the FT100 like CNE did
The FT editors shorted GKP at one point 2 years ago but they were not the % majority


May 31 (Reuters) - EnCore Oil PLC:

* Goldman Sachs raises Encore Oil Plc to neutral from


sell

* Goldman Sachs cuts Encore Oil Plc price target to 96P from 133P

Encore is not strong on its recovery today, waited and just bought a bit
 
Last edited:
TA is an enhancement not a total solution
TA can be obvious stuff like this share has been going up every month on average.

Its an area full of pseudoscience unfortunately which doesn't do the field any favours - some of it might have some merit, can be quantified and tested - lots of it however either needs to be evaluated subjectively (so essentially is worthless) or relies on choosing arbitrary parameters (fairly obvious issues here too).

Japanese candlesticks are information. There is nothing added beyond fact, it shows highest price, lowest, the open and closing price all in 1 bar.

Ordinary price bars show you that without the addition of a coloured body, Japanese candle sticks were invented in order to attempt to predict future price movements - 'dojis', 'shooting stars' etc..etc.. . Unfortunately they rely on chart patterns which will either be subjective or will need to be defined arbitrarily. Perhpas a nice way of displaying data - if you want green/red or shaded/unshaded bars but I'd be rather skeptical about using them for their intended purpose of prediction.

People tend to stick to TA as its easily accessible, easy to 'understand', doesn't required any mathematical or financial knowledge and gives them an easy framework from which to start trading. Its heavily promoted by brokers/spread betting firms as its something they can use to 'educate' clients with relatively quickly and get them placing trades ASAP. Unfortunately for them the reality is that extracting money from the markets on a consistent basis is much harder than that.
 
Last edited:
Could be a bit of a turn around day today still though it looks bad now, that is an ideal (trading) scenario

Dollar is again weaker which helps anything alternate like commoditys


HER is reversing all its gains. Should have held around here really, losing both 5 day average price and remaining 40% of its rise.

Considering it had already fell last month, someone doesnt like this company or its future funding problems maybe?


Lloyds losing its grip, going to 45 maybe. Reflected doom from the US of Fail

So I buy some HER and LLOY, sold some RRL yesterday buy back at 16 or lower



TA = weather forecasting


Anyone like Microsoft as a share? As well as Intel these give good divs, they always look cheap to me
 
Last edited:
Silversurfer, do you think we are on the verge of a big downturn atm?

Also, you seem like you have been doing this a while, what is your average return rate as a percentage of your portfolio value. 10%, 20%, 30% a year??
 
Big question but simple answer I think is shares are not overvalued in return/risk vs cash inflation risks


All paper cash is based on dollar value, that idea is changing to fix to gold or who knows what instead so I'd say holding large amounts of cash is more dangerous then shares in general.
If you look at a tenner it has a promise on it, where as the contract for a share is division of ownership.

This Arab spring is related to financial pressures, so if we talk of a 'crash' Im thinking of events of a tectonic scale

This may cause upset so stay flexible I think is best but not completely liquid

The 1987 crash was tiny for example, that was a technical blip. Im thinking the whole bias will change but who knows exactly how.

Watch videos of WArren Buffet, I think he sold all his bonds now



News Gulfsands Petroleum (GPX) has suspended work at an exploration well in Syria after failing to find commercial quantities of oil pushed the explorer's shares down 30.25p to 234.75p. The group said that a series of drill-stem tests undertaken on the Abu Ghazal-1 exploration well resulted in the recovery of "sub-commercial quantities of heavy/viscous oil".
Dropped 11%, I thought due to the revolution. Kinda surprised they are not cheaper
At 10 PE still cant call them a bargain but it is cheap.

Average annual return was 17% when I looked in April but we fell a lot since then so not that great really. I dont include some of the quick trades so call it 10% overall. That is everything including a SIPP and I dont deal penny shares in large amounts like some so theres no chance of me getting big gains really

If you are new just buy a unit trust fund as its much easier and cheaper. An Asia pacific tracker I got from L&G was simple to do but one of my best investments ever, it holds things like BHP and Samsung for you without the hassle. Very much less risk


Lots of moaning about North sea tax. If that was altered it might give a boost to a few shares
 
TA = weather forecasting

Weather forecasting is a pretty complex area and the people who work in the field come form the same initial pool as those employed as researchers by large CTAs/Hedge funds - mathematicians and physicists. It couldn't be further from TA tbh...

A better analogy would be TA(or at least the majority of it) = the crude barometers you can stick on your mantelpiece that will give you a good prediction every so often purely out of chance.... ;)
 
It's all too much risk. How do you live with those levels of stress?

Ask this guy

alphatrends

if you have never seen this 1987 PBS documentary about Paul Tudor Jones, you're missing out http://bit.ly/jzmjL3


Weather forecasting is a pretty complex area and the people who work in the field come form the same initial pool as those employed as researchers by large CTAs/Hedge funds

Sounded like you got my point but then said not
Markets are a natural phenomena because people are and a reoccurring pattern does occur, chaotic as prices may be ultimately its about the people and human nature or this thread would be redundant


COUNTRY SIZE BY OIL RESERVES
 
Last edited:
The 1987 PBS Film on Paul Tudor Jones entitled 'Trader: The Documentary'. This video has been extremely hard to find and those possessing a precious copy guard it with their life and/or sell it on eBay for hundreds if not thousands of dollars.

This is hedge fund manager & legend Paul Tudor Jones in his element. He is notorious for predicting and profiting from the stock market crash in 1987. The video takes you inside Tudor Investment Corp back when they were only 22 employees large and managing around $130 million. Today, obviously, they are much, much bigger. We cover Tudor Investment Corp here on the blog because of Tudor's excellent track record and legendary status. We've covered Tudor's recent equity portfolio, as well as good quotes from Paul Tudor Jones in the past. Lastly, we also posted up his hedge fund manager interview. This documentary is insider footage of what things were like at Tudor's firm during the build-up to some of the most interesting times in the stock market's history. Enjoy the videos!

Read more: http://www.marketfolly.com/2009/07/paul-tudor-jones-1987-pbs-film-trader.html#ixzz1OJzxULg9"

http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/XH5W4vffBbY/ :D
 
Sounded like you got my point but then said not
Markets are a natural phenomena because people are and a reoccurring pattern does occur, chaotic as prices may be ultimately its about the people and human nature or this thread would be redundant

Sorry to be pedantic but I simply feel obliged to respond when I see TA mentioned without critique. Leaving such posts unchecked could well lead someone else observing the thread to look into it uncritically as some sort of scientifically valid method for analysing financial time series data - then potentially blindly following this stuff and suffering a financial loss. The majority of TA is pseudo-science.
 
Sold last of my Rockhopper regrettably

Just trying to reduce risk /staying liquid again, plenty of chance they could get over 300 properly and stay there but its a bit of hill to get over first. over 265 a positive share


Bought more CAD which is an actual (small) producer backed by sales of assets, etc

Looking at RRL EO RIO FXP

ABG fallen big time
 
DES is a joke I just do not see why it keeps going up, I'm still holding them so I may dump them soon as I don't think they have much chance of getting the money together for another well
 
Bit of a sharp fall today. My portfolio down .5% :(

They say the large/mega cap miners are the cheapest they have been for 25yrs! I am topping up on Blackrock World Mining trust as a long term hold
 
Back
Top Bottom