you'd like to think that about Rolex huh? You'd be wrong, take a look at a Grand Seiko or an A. Lahnge & sonne compared to a Rolex and the Rolex quality control is mediocre at best!
What are their prices like in comparison on a like for like model?
you'd like to think that about Rolex huh? You'd be wrong, take a look at a Grand Seiko or an A. Lahnge & sonne compared to a Rolex and the Rolex quality control is mediocre at best!
A basic sport model Rolex is unobtainium. If you can get a 5k Air King (their worst model) you can flip it the same day for 6k. If you get a £7k Submariner you can flip it for 13k the next day. A 10k Daytona...next day, 30k.What are their prices like in comparison on a like for like model?
What are their prices like in comparison on a like for like model?
I always shoe people like that away.
I collect them. Both to wear, display and also store for investment.
I never got why they go up in value. Its not like they're technological or artistic masterpieces. They're normally just a different colourscheme of something mass produced.
They are limited edition.
Same reason limited edition pokemon cards, ferraris, etc go up in value over time.
Anything collectible and has appeal will go up in value if limited. It's the basics of supply and demand. Demand needs to be there. So you can't just make a limited run of any old crap.
Why would you display a trainer? I get displaying something that shows craftsmanship or even art. But an item of clothing?
It's to show off to other collectors most likely. The same reason people have signed football shirts, basketballs, etc on display. Pokemon cards, figurines, star wars stuff.
But they're literally just different colours of something completely mediocre.
What, does he have random dudes coming round his house to 'mire his shoes?
Wanna come look at my boxer short collection?
Mediocre in your opinion. I really like AJ1's I'm not so keen on any of the others. The same way I think people who buy star wars stuff for hundreds of pounds are buying overpriced plastic is how you view trainers but the reality is these have a huge brand following behind them. Therefore it's not as black and white as you suggest
No, mediocre in that they're not highly crafted items.
Are star wars collectibles highly crafted items?
Its the reason why these trainers sell for £90. And not a £9 million ferrari. It doesn't need to be hand crafted from italian leather at this price point.
Reebok made the original trainers worn by Ripley and Bishop in Aliens (1986), before selling them as the Bugstompers on the market.
Every now and then they re-release them as they're guaranteed 100% sales at about £3-400 per pair, but they're usually sold out faster than graphics cards and invariably to scalpers who drive the price up to £1500 immediately.
But even with plain trainers - If the colour scheme thing didn't work, Samsung wouldn't now be doing the same mass-produced folding phones in 40 different colours.
I've seen it for a few years but can someone explain what the trainers/sneakers craze is all about? Some people just buy them and then display them. Some of them look ugly, I don't get it.
https://twitter.com/GadgetsBoy/status/1454086197278609412?t=RXgtcS_bnS0TgXb-PaYGJQ&s=19
What is not mediocre in your opinion? I know people who collect empty beer bottles, it makes them happy and thats a good enough reason for me.No, mediocre in that they're not highly crafted items.
it makes them makes and thats a good enough reason for me.