Type R and VTEC owners

Put the standard box back on and remove the resonator, you won't get much better than that except a CAI but that'll be more expensive.

I'm not sure how much standard suspension is but I was looking at Bilsteins for mine, fixed height with a little drop over stock and £600 IIRC. You could also look into replacing some of the bushes. Either option should breathe new life into an old and possibly tired car.

I certainly wouldn't be spending 35-40% of the cars value on an airbox.
 
[-]
Torque steer, it really is as bad as they say
Steering, felt numb and unconnected
Exterior, dull and uninspiring
Interior, dull and ininspring
It's an Astra
It's a Vauxhall

Caught in the monent I really did have fun and almost convinced myself I preferred it to a Type-R. However you soon realise much of the fun is the fact that youre fighting the torque steer and numb steering, coupled with understeer and a chassis that doesnt inspire confidence.

Conclusion, I can see the attraction but for those who have experienced better handling perfornance cars will not be convinced by the sole party trick of a 2.0 Turbo strapped to an undeserving chassis.

Cant believe Im saying this, especially after the above post I made but Im having a fight with myself...

2007 Civic Type-R GT with 19" Rage alloys + GP kit
Or
2008 Vauxhall Astra VXR Nurburgring Edition

Something about that VXR test drive keeps drawing me back, so so fun. Though I still think the Civic is the better overall package. Aghhh, cant decide :(
I'm confused? Surely it's a no brainer after what you wrote above? Trust me, the Turbo novelty will wear off, especially when you realise you can't make the same progress as you can in the Civic.
 
Hi peeps again.

I've seen an silver ep3 Type R. Now its a 2001 model but its only done 75k. I was wondering what to look out for on the early pre-facelifts?
Seller says its in mint condition but you never know.

cheers.

Clutch at that mileage (listen out for release bearing), ask about timing chain issues. Apart from that they're pretty bullet proof, as long as you have a sensible head and cover any issues a normal car would have etc.
 
What's the major differences?
I'm thinking of test driving the earlier one to see if I like the style before doing a 60 mile round trip.

The facelift model was introduced in 2004. There are roughly 1500 changes, however the main ones are:

Lighter flywheel.
Additional sound deadening
Different front and rear light clusters.
Different front bumper
Red door inserts and red inserts on the seats
 
Wouldn't that be pointless on 10 year old worn suspension?
Yes and no, though it would depend on the condition of the car. Sure it'll be worn and not as 'tight' as it once were, doesn't mean geo won't make a noticeable difference to its handling.

I kind of see your point though, around that age is where things like track rod ends and bushes should be thought about, especially on a hot hatch. I know a few DC2 owners who have had theirs changed on 10+ year old cars and they say it's been the best money spent.

Due to the nature of how the parts deteriorate it's one of those that you never really notice it happening till something fails or you get them changed.
 
One thing I would be weary of on an engine that's done over 100k (nb figure plucked from thin air) is the timing chain, as time goes one more and more are turning up where the timing chain has stretched. Definitely something to consider if you've got one with higher mileage or you're considering buying one. I think it's a 6 hour job to replace so they're not cheap.
 
The problem with DC5 brakes is that the standard disks are rubbish, the calipers are great though when complimented with good pads.

I wouldn't run Wilwoods on a road car.
 
Back
Top Bottom