Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
... 5 at the back same result as last time.
7 at the back vs City?
7 at the back vs City?
A shame really as he’s been really good compared to the previous season or two and spared our blushes on more than one occasion.That was poor from DDG.
There's nothing wrong with a 5-3-2, if you have poor to average defenders and they are badly coached you just need to stick as many of them on the pitch and hope for the best. Trust the manager and the players.Quite funny that Ole has spent 3 years building a team and has now changed to a system that completely doesn't fit his squad simply because he isn't capable of getting a tune out of his players in a more complex one.
He should see if he can get the England job when Southgate eventually steps down.
They are gonna need some of that wallpaper to cover the cracks again tonight.
... 5 at the back same result as last time.
7 at the back vs City?
Ole is completely out of ideas so has basically gone for a very defensive system in the hope our star players can pull something off.
All this talk of attacking football and United DNA, embarrassing.
Ole is completely out of ideas so has basically gone for a very defensive system in the hope our star players can pull something off.
All this talk of attacking football and United DNA, embarrassing.
Ole is completely out of ideas so has basically gone for a very defensive system in the hope our star players can pull something off.
All this talk of attacking football and United DNA, embarrassing.