The majority of press today has focused on Balotelli swapping shirts at half time when it should really be on how rubbish Liverpool were tactically, Brendan must be delighted he's got a scapegoat.
He still hasn't got a clue how to set up a team to not lose (see V Chelsea last year) which is sometimes as good as a win & you frustrate the life out of better attacking sides which by doing so can get you wins, see Chelsea in 2012.
He's spent an awful lot of money this season and has gone backwards, I wonder if Liverpool fans now realise that it's not just about how much money you spend.
Wasn't there a point where everyone was giving Spurs grief about how they spent and how they wasted all the money and everyone piled on. Even though they hadn't dropped really any points on the previous season it was just the actual performances were god awful and it was awful to watch football.
The comparison was made over summer, bale/Suarez, big money, club spending it on a relatively large number of younger/less known/bigger risk players. Liverpool fans were very insistent they weren't in the same situation as Spurs....... funny how things work out really isn't it
Liverpool are now doing most things wrong. Harry Redknapp style management, don't fix the defence in terms of training, tactics, coaching.... just bring in new players and hope that fixes the defence.
I saw I think footie 365 basically saying Rodgers had said, while talking about England, don't blame the players, blame the coaching......... yet he just replaces defenders rather than change the coaching. Not sure if he's blind or just a hypocrite.
Rodgers is tactically pretty poor, he relied on several very pacey players and said, run your hearts out for 30 mins, even if it meant the next 60 minutes would be harder.
All the top teams are weathering this 30 minute storm then beating Liverpool now. Stupid teams(Spurs/Arsenal) are completely tactically inept and pushed forwards during this 25-30 minute period and got caught time and time again. Chelsea/Real/City sat further back, attacked less, made that 30 minutes hard and then really went on to comfortably dominate the next 60 minutes of the game.
It's an exceptionally risky tactic, it's also ridiculously predictable and pretty damn easy to counter, even with Suarez there the genuinely top teams weren't getting caught out by it, without Suarez the tactic isn't even working well against worse opposition and the bigger games are much less close.
Thing is, with this effectively single tactic, why didn't he go out and buy the fastest striker possible? One who actually suited this one real strength of the team and the only real tactic he uses?