But then they'd have to find an extra team for Spurs to play, and surely then one of the groups would have 5 teams in it?
No need to pander and explain to the obvious ***** trying to wind fans up... they know exactly what they're doing.Not really, one of the byes could be dropped meaning the amount of teams going through qualification would be the same.
Oh well, no point in wishful thinking - congrats again Chelsea.
Point was Latvia was just an example, there are pub teams in the qualifiers of the CL...
Does that even matter? This hypothetical Latvian side wouldn't win the competition and neither would Spurs![]()
Anyways one great thing about this result is that we will now have a fire sale of decent quality spurs players other clubs can buy.
lets see:
Bale to barca
Modric to arsenal
vdv to chelsea
Adebayor > back to city(after begging manchini)
Why should the champions of another league have their participation taken away exactly? To make Spurs fans feel better?
Not really, one of the byes could be dropped meaning the amount of teams going through qualification would be the same.
Oh well, no point in wishful thinking - congrats again Chelsea.
What do people think on Drogba then, reward him with a new contract or will he want to walk away on a high like Henry? I think he's still a beast, and I can't see any reason he can't play alongside Torres who has impressed me, less with his shooting, but he's been working hard, tracking back, won the ball a good few times, and won the corner for the first goal.
Fact is I don't want to see teams only defend, but unlike many here I respect great defending as much as great attacking and the defense tonight was outstanding, the other team can shoot as much as they want if you can block every shot and Cahill, Cole, Lampard in particular were absolutely outstanding at getting in the way of shots, tackling, stopping chances, etc, etc.
But, I think they were defending in that manor more because they were at a desparate stage of the season after them getting SO bad under AVB, this wasn't Chelsea at their best, it was Chelsea at their worst when Matteo took over and they didn't have time to rebuild, refocus the whole team and get everything working, so they went the build on a solid defence route, its good management.
The question for me is, if RDM stays, can he actually go from organising a great defence with great defensive players, to building an attacking team capable of winning a league title again..... that is an entirely different job and I have no idea, I think he deserves the chance to try though at the very least.
This is where certain liverpool fans and them laughing at talking to Martinez makes no sense, manager's can do different things with different sets of players, with different goals and different quality of players at their disposal.
What do people think on Drogba then, reward him with a new contract or will he want to walk away on a high like Henry?
Take away a club's automatic qualification?
This rule's been around for years... it hasn't been newly created, or retroactively enforced... I don't see how anyone can say it's unfair...
And what I said still holds! I didn't deny it wouldn't have all the goalfest/attacking excitement... my contention was that doesn't mean it won't have quality (as 'quality' doesn't just mean attacking football). I actually thought it was a great match to watch - full of tension, which I love.
You really think a club in Latvia are as good as any PL side?
It was a poor game? Are you joking?
What do people think on Drogba then, reward him with a new contract or will he want to walk away on a high like Henry?