UEFA Champions League Final Liverpool v Real Madrid ** spoilers ** [Saturday 28th May 2022]

[CliffyG]

Other than that mad moment at the end we've played well and just been missing a goal. Only slight negative has been Diaz, who has been running down blind alleys all half.

No you haven't. It has to been a deliberate action, not a deflection.

Is that an actual rule? I've never seen anything like that mentioned before. I thought the offside rule only applies on a forward pass from an attacking player. I've seen plenty of goals scored from passes behind by the defensive player and none of them were intentional.

 

[Purdy]

It deflected twice which is the only contentious part of the decision, I’ll say I don’t know what is the correct decision in that scenario.

Last intentional play was by a Madrid player at which point it is offside

 

[beachBOYken]

I think they made a new offside rule during the VAR check.

 

[BaZ87]

Is that an actual rule? I've never seen anything like that mentioned before. I thought the offside rule only applies on a forward pass from an attacking player. I've seen plenty of goals scored from passes behind by the defensive player and none of them were intentional.

Yes, it is the rule. It's not new either. The key thing to what you've said is passes behind by the defensive player - there wasn't a pass behind by a Liverpool player.

 

[Lyle44]

Off 3 or 4 pool players yet no goal because unintentional?? Bs rules

 

[CliffyG]

He was sliding in to cleat the ball how the **** isn't it a deliberate action.

 

[Robbo]

Could you not argue it is a deliberate action by Fabinho, he's thrown himself to the ground to get the ball... if he was stood up it wouldn't have hit him.

 

[McBain]

Another rule that’s a joke, add it to the long list.

 

[Pigeon_Killer]

Hate Walton, the rule’s a bag of **** and he’s talking like it’s common sense.

 

[The_One]

liverpool var

 

[utajoker]

did not know the 2 player thing about the offside rule

 

[nemtizz]

Why would a player deliberately do that? Walton is a cretin.

 

[robfosters]

For me that should have been a goal

You know the pool fans would be having a meltdown on here if had been them ruled offside

 

[omnomnom]

I think they made a new offside rule during the VAR check.

Yea thats it. You've had it explained to you several times but sure.

Rios an idiot.

Could you not argue it is a deliberate action by Fabinho, he's thrown himself to the ground to get the ball... if he was stood up it wouldn't have hit him.

Youre honestly telling me that was his intention? To knee the ball?

 

[Purdy]

Feel like Walton just lied, no way it’s true lol

 

[McBain]

Ahh ok. Is that a recent new rule.

Er no.

 

[CliffyG]

Yes, it is the rule. It's not new either. The key thing to what you've said is passes behind by the defensive player - there wasn't a pass behind by a Liverpool player.

Never seen it before and I've watched a lot of footy. Doesn't make any sense to me, Real never played a forward ball in that scramble.

 

[BaZ87]

2022 and jonneymendoza is still getting bites.

 

[The_One]

Yea thats it. You've had it explained to you several times but sure.

Rios an idiot.


Youre honestly telling me that was his intention? To knee the ball?

so fabinho isnt trying to put a block on the shot? thats intentional.....

 

[chroniclard]

So anyway, Camila crabeo, bit rough?