Wonder if people's views would be different if it hit his hand full on and not brushed itI mean, by the rules, it's a penalty.
It shouldn't be though.
I think they need to look at offside again, I mean a toe? Seems a bit daft.
Wonder if people's views would be different if it hit his hand full on and not brushed itI mean, by the rules, it's a penalty.
It shouldn't be though.
I think they need to look at offside again, I mean a toe? Seems a bit daft.
Because it's English officials again tonight.Automated VAR gives them that offside in seconds, right decision but how did they take 45 seconds to make that decision?
Handball, Tyldesley said what were all thinking.
Coz it's a natural position. Ppl don't run about with their arms by their side.He's got his arm raised up, not sure why it wouldn't be a penalty
So if that happened on the line and prevented a goal you'd be fine with that?Coz it's a natural position. Ppl don't run about with their arms by their side.
Coz it's a natural position. Ppl don't run about with their arms by their side.
So if that happened on the line and prevented a goal you'd be fine with that?
Straw manSo if that happened on the line and prevented a goal you'd be fine with that?
If one is a handball they both are.That's the context that's been removed from these decisions. Your scenario, it's a pen. Andersens scenario is it's from a cross at the edge of the box and it's hit his arm in a split second.
Straw man
If one is a handball they both are.