Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes they are saying it's a special operation what they are doing inside Ukraine and gave a list of objectives.
The whole world can see through Russias bs.

Luckily our media was embedded with the troops during the Iraq invasion liberation so was completely biased honest.

Whilst I appreciate what you are getting at, there is a difference in that Iraq was ruled by a despotic dictator and many in Iraq welcomed his removal.

Aside from the disputed territories, the Ukraine people most definitely did not want Russia invading them to remove Zelensky. Zelensky is a democratically elected ex-actor/comedian, not Saddam Hussain.

Now whether it was down to the US to take it upon themselves to remove Saddam is up for debate, but there is a clear difference between both scenarios , and what Russia are doing is objectively worse.
 
Facebook will now allow people to say death to russian soldiers, etc without banning them.

Free speech of course...

Is it that bad to allow Ukrainians to say they want to kill the ***** that are (with zero justifiable reason) invading their country and bombing their maternity wards..?
 
Facebook will now allow people to say death to russian soldiers, etc without banning them.

Temporarily, in some countries, with caveats.

Facebook and Instagram posts calling for Vladimir Putin's death - and violence against Russian soldiers - are going to be temporarily allowed in some countries, according to Reuters.

Meta, which owns both social networks, has reportedly sent emails to moderators that explain the company is making "allowances for forms of political expression that would normally violate our rules".

The encouragement of violence against Russian civilians will continue to be prohibited - and posts calling for the president's death will be deleted if they contain other targets or discuss a location or method.

...The temporary policy only applies to users in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Ukraine, according to the news agency's report.

An email seen by Reuters told moderators: "We are issuing a spirit-of-the-policy allowance to allow T1 violent speech that would otherwise be removed under the Hate Speech policy when: (a) targeting Russian soldiers, EXCEPT prisoners of war, or (b) targeting Russians where it's clear that the context is the Russian invasion of Ukraine (e.g., content mentions the invasion, self-defence, etc.)"

The message went on to explain that the rules are being changed because "Russian soldiers" is being used as a proxy for the military in relation to this invasion.

Meta said: "In light of the ongoing invasion of Ukraine, we made a temporary exception for those affected by war to express sentiments towards invading armed forces such as ''death to the Russian invaders'.

"These are temporary measures designed to preserve voice and expression for people who are facing invasion. As always, we are prohibiting calls for violence against Russians outside of the narrow context of the current invasion."

I still think it's a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
Basically Russian combat service support isn't high end, doesn't take General Montgomery to understand that. What is clear is that their actual tactics, comms and even fighting troops aren't great either.

But looks like the diplomacy of the west, mainly the US is currently under performing, so we aren't exactly seizing the initiative at the min. Russia are stuck in the mud and we are faffing around with indecision. Giving Putin plenty time to re organise his absolute farce.

Key point Kamala Harris performance with the Polish, shambles.

The US is leaving it to the EU and the EU members of NATO.

The US also has to be seen to stick with it's legal agreements.
 
I'm honestly not sure if the Russians have the capacity to keep the artillery supplied for sustained, large scale barrages.

Russia has essentially no independent manufacturing capability. Even the manufacturing it does have mostly relies on Western machines to make the stuff, and they now have no ability to get spares or support for those machines. This is going to become a massive problem for their war effort as time goes on.
 
They seem to be having issues with supplying food and fuel to their troops, and apparently their logistics corps is about half the size of the equivalent US/Western one, whilst a single barrage from one of their rocket vehicles uses a full truck load.
Their logistics setup from what I understand is designed to be working in conjunction with nearby railway resupply not advancing into another country and relying on the road network to keep units supplied, so they've got less vehicles dedicated to resupply than the US, whilst at the same time they're far more "consumable" heavy than the US due to their reliance on artillery, the end result is that it's much harder to keep their heavy/long distance stuff stocked up. That's before you consider that the vehicles carrying the supplies are basically unarmoured sitting ducks to anyone with a fairly light weapons, let alone people with stuff designed to take out armoured targets and you get a situation where every supply vehicle hit massively impacts the ability to carry on.

Something I got derided for saying earlier in the thread but now we can see it evidenced how even in this day and age Russia still relies heavily on railways for forward logistics - one thing that has always concerned them about the UK, more even than our nuclear weapons, is our ability to rapidly logistic and fight half-way around the globe. So it has been sad to see that ability eroded by cuts over the last few years.
 
William was born in 1982. He was a child at the time.

The objections to his comments are stupid.
and I was born in 1981 I still remember those wars... he would have been an adult when nato was bombing stuff in 1999

maybe he doesn't know about ww2 either because he wasn't born then.
 
He's completely wrong... 90s are calling for sure

guess he forgot all the wars from 1991>1999 and the genocide going on, the nato bombing campaigns

I'm about the same age - stuff like Bosnia didn't really have the same impact on our generation and younger - maybe on those older.

Though I do somewhat remember - it never had the same over-shadowing impact in the background.
 
News from the past hr:

*UK Defence Ministry: Russia Likely Seeking to Reset, Re-Posture Forces for Renewed Offensive Activity in Coming Days – Probably Include Ops Against Kyiv
*The Prime Minister of Hungary Victor Orban Said That the EU Will Not Impose Sanctions Against the Russian Federation That Would Affect Gas or Oil

https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1502161078125355013
https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...l-not-sanction-russian-gas-or-oil-2022-03-11/


FNi_ihGVkAcwHZ8


The EU being weak again.
Glad we're out...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom