Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
Why, most of the cities will modernise and become efficient. Historical builds are a pain and cost a lot to service.
Russia? Modernise? Efficient?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf403/cf403fd9d74fcb9787855d218f4b5df4589edfb3" alt="Cry laughing :cry: :cry:"
Why, most of the cities will modernise and become efficient. Historical builds are a pain and cost a lot to service.
Ukraine not Russia.Russia? Modernise? Efficient?![]()
Ukraine not Russia.
oh right, gotcha.Won't be if Russia wins.
They better surrender now, before they end up like that
![]()
Won't be if Russia wins.
Yea, I mean Russia are just saving the best troops for last, right?
It will take years to rebuild, but it will rebuild. Did you see the state of German cities after WW2?Who knows. Even if Ukraine win it have you seen the state of the place?
It will take years to rebuild, but it will rebuild. Did you see the state of German cities after WW2?
Even if Ukraine win it have you seen the state of the place?
Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.Yea, I mean Russia are just saving the best troops for last, right?
Ukraine could well be a very nice place to live in a few years time, but it won't be nice to have a failed pariah state next door.The problem with looking at pictures of devastation is that it can easily give an overblown impression of how much of the country as a whole is in ruins. Most of Ukraine is still untouched, or easily repaired, the pockets of utter devastation will take a lot of rebuilding and there are important pieces of infrastructure to repair but we shouldn't underestimate how quickly countries can get themselves back on their feet after this kind of thing. We've seen it many times before, and with huge sums of money already pledged, and masses of Western goodwill coming their way, Ukraine in a decade's time is likely to be in a pretty good place.
Unlike Russia.
Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.
I love you way you just dip in and out every few days with some loony statement and disappear never to defend this nonsense.Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.
I love you way you just dip in and out every few days with some loony statement and disappear never to defend this nonsense.
What are Russia troops going to be armed with, sticks and stones? They can't arm the forces they've got in Ukraine and are being steadily beaten back on all fronts by Ukraine (who aren't "the NATO army" btw). They've embarrassed themselves by this utter farce.
“Her” not “his” - Russia is the Motherland after all.Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.
and that is gameover for the nato army.
If you listen to US Colonel douglas macgregor and UN weapons inspector scott ritter, you will see that what you said is not true.I love you way you just dip in and out every few days with some loony statement and disappear never to defend this nonsense.
What are Russias million troops going to be armed with, sticks and stones? They can't arm the forces they've got in Ukraine currently and are being steadily beaten back on all fronts by Ukraine (who aren't "the NATO army" btw). Ukraine was never a top tier military nation and look what they're achieving against the world's "Second army".
They've embarrassed themselves by this utter farce.
Theoretically ability clearly doesn't tally with their real world ability, which is utterly dire.