Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

[Firestar_3x]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

Interesting, because from this this side of the Iron Curtain, Russia is becoming an expansion of North Korea.

 

[topgun06]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

So if they've been using less than 1% of their capabilities, what would sending 1,000,000 troops in equate to as a percentage of their capabilities?

Why only use less than 1% if it meant having to withdraw and retreat to the Donbas? Why not just use a measly 10% and take Kyiv with ease - which was clearly a goal. You're claiming they made a choice to utterly fail instead of steamrollering the place.

What utter nonsense

 

[Firestar_3x]

So if they've been using less than 1% of their capabilities, what would sending 1,000,000 troops in equate to as a percentage of their capabilities?

Why only use less than 1% if it meant having to withdraw and retreat to the Donbas? Why not just use a measly 10% and take Kyiv with ease - which was clearly a goal. You're claiming they made a choice to utterly fail instead of steamrollering the place.

What utter nonsense

Clearly this is a strategic defeat to show the world how compassionate Russia is.

 

[Minstadave]

If you listen to US Colonel douglas macgregor and UN weapons inspector scott ritter, you will see that what you said is not true.

This is your answer every time, the same two names. Is it possible that they're not telling the truth? How do you tally what your saying not fitting observed reality? Where is this mighty Russian army? Why are they fielding convicts with ancient equipment? Why are they losing ground across all fronts?

 

[Goodie]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

you should go on tour

Preferably starting in Kherson.

 

[topgun06]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.

Also, why the need to go cap in hand to Iran and North Korea if they could just double the utilisation of their capabilities to 2%?

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Who knows. Even if Ukraine win it have you seen the state of the place?

Did you see the state of Europe after WW2 or Japan. They rebuilt and thrived.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

He’s raging against the machine, leave him alone.

Hey don't you sully that band with that poster. Rage Against the Machine rock!

 

[Deleted member 77746]

Did you see the state of Europe after WW2 or Japan. They rebuilt and thrived.

yes but it takes time. A lot of people killed in the process and living in ruined conditions.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

Ok you're definitely trolling us now.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

yes but it takes time. A lot of people killed in the process and living in ruined conditions.

Yeah that's what war does, it comes with terrible costs but in WW2 we defeated the evil that was Hitler, now Ukraine will defeat the evil that is Putin.

 

[Deleted member 77746]

Yeah that's what war does, it comes with terrible costs but in WW2 we defeated the evil that was Hitler, now Ukraine will defeat the evil that is Putin.

Maybe so but that will only be temp. If Putin doesn't win, maybe one day the next attack will 100% be nuclear.

 

[kylew_is_back]

This is your answer every time, the same two names. Is it possible that they're not telling the truth? How do you tally what your saying not fitting observed reality? Where is this mighty Russian army? Why are they fielding convicts with ancient equipment? Why are they losing ground across all fronts?

Because Russia is doing an SMO to avoid any further escalation, and is maintaining this situation in the hopes that ukraine surrender. But this attitude will change very soon, even as early as December with a massive Russian offensive.

 

[Minstadave]

Because Russia is doing an SMO to avoid any further escalation, and is maintaining this situation in the hopes that ukraine surrender. But this attitude will change very soon, even as early as December with a massive Russian offensive.

So much copium. The whole Russian population will be queuing up to join the mighty winter offensive I'm sure. Who wouldn't want to go starve on the Russian frontlines?

 

[Rroff]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

What modern weapons? their latest artillery systems have proven to be totally outclassed against modern NATO systems, the advantage they had was in numbers which is slipping as they've used about 30% of their existing stock (active and reserves) and probably only have about the same amount again or a little more which can be brought back into service. Many of the Russian tanks and aircraft used in Ukraine belong in the 1970s and the newer stuff like the T-90s are plagued with issues. They deployed around 10 "Terminators" to much fanfare and then had to pull them back to defensive use when they utterly failed in their intended role.

(They still have a lot more sort of modern T-80s and can bring back into service, eventually, a lot more T-72As, etc. than people generally allow but that is another story).

They've had huge issues with the logistics of a relatively small deployment in Syria and can barely cope with supporting an army a few miles outside their own borders - how are they going to manage with millions of troops up to over 1000 miles away?

 

[redfist]

Kylew will need to make a new account

Doesn’t he have a few already, there’s a couple that post similar drivel

 

[gtl_racer]

Since February Russia is only using less than 1% of his military capabilities. Next year we are probably going to see one million Russian troops entering ukraine, and that is gameover for the nato army.
We also need to realize that Russia is theoretically capable of arm and support 20-25 million troops with modern weapons marching from murmansk - kherson line to the Atlantic coast.

You're crazy.

 

[SupraWez]

Nato would destroy russia.

Damn right, in a non nuclear conflict Russia doesn't stand a chance.

I think they know this hence not involving any Nato members directly, I am sure there are a few war mongering leaders itching to go but they have no legal right to get involved directly, can you imagine what new advanced toys are at the ready.

 

[kylew_is_back]

What modern weapons? their latest artillery systems have proven to be totally outclassed against modern NATO systems, the advantage they had was in numbers which is slipping as they've used about 30% of their existing stock (active and reserves) and probably only have about the same amount again or a little more which can be brought back into service. Many of the Russian tanks and aircraft used in Ukraine belong in the 1970s and the newer stuff like the T-90s are plagued with issues. They deployed around 10 "Terminators" to much fanfare and then had to pull them back to defensive use when they utterly failed in their intended role.

(They still have a lot more sort of modern T-80s and can bring back into service, eventually, a lot more T-72As, etc. than people generally allow but that is another story).

They've had huge issues with the logistics of a relatively small deployment in Syria and can barely cope with supporting an army a few miles outside their own borders - how are they going to manage with millions of troops up to over 1000 miles away?

All these are the typical lies the western media is telling you. I advise you to start reading RT, Sputnik, Pravda etc, and also listen to US Colonel douglas macgregor and UN weapons inspector scott ritter.

If you only read what BBC(and mainstream media) has to tell you, you will get a very distorted worldview.

 

[Murf]

All these are the typical lies the western media is telling you. I advise you to start reading RT, Sputnik, Pravda etc, and also listen to US Colonel douglas macgregor and UN weapons inspector scott ritter.

If you only read what BBC(and mainstream media) has to tell you, you will get a very distorted worldview.

The absolute state of this.