Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Crimea is a large area but only connected to the mainland by a narrow bottleneck where Russia have been making their defences ready for the best part of a decade. Worse, even if they can punch through that first bottleneck there's another a few dozen kms further in. Then, even if they can punch through the rest of Crimea, Russia has a large military base at Sevastapol making an ideal place to mount a rearguard action from. Meanwhile, Ukraine doesn't have the sea power to mount an amphibious assault, whilst Russia does have the sea power to keep weapons and soldiers flowing into the region even with its bridge connection severed.

It's difficult to see how Ukraine can take Crimea back at all, let alone as an early target.
When it comes to the battle for Crimea Russia has already taken a huge defeat. Morale will be rock bottom, HIMARS will sink that moral even further.

Maybe they conscripts will run, leaving just the separatists. Who knows but to get to fight for Crimea does mean the Russians are very much on the back foot.
 
Give Ukraine the missiles to hit Moscow and Putin will be overthrown in a couple of days.

Russians don't care about Ukraine but start bombing Moscow and its all over.

If the Ukrainians produce their own missiles and attack Moscow, go for it.

Supplying them missiles which they can fire at Moscow is considerably different and makes us an active participant in their local war.
 
If you were conscripted and sent for training on foreign soil you would be about jackpot win level getting trained by the Brits.

I mean compare to the "training" putins regularly conscripted bunch of drunks and thugs get there is going to be no comparison when Ukraine go on the offensive again.

NATO need to make bloody sure they get Ukraine in eventually, will be a lot strong for it. (In Europe)
I don't think Germany or France would support this. Theire politicians are neck deep in ruzzki money.
 
If the Ukrainians produce their own missiles and attack Moscow, go for it.

Supplying them missiles which they can fire at Moscow is considerably different and makes us an active participant in their local war.

Russia won’t do anything about it, it’s no different to Iran supplying the same equipment, it’s just like for like at this point.
 
*Russian Missile Attack Has Caused 50% Drop In Ukrainian Energy Consumption - Ukrenergo Statement
*Ukraine Energy Minister Says Nine Power Facilities Were Damaged During Russia’s Missile Attack on Friday
*Ukraine’s Power Grid Operator Says It Will Take Longer to Restore Power This Time Compared With Previous Russian Attacks

*Ukraine's Army Chief Says 60 Out of 76 Russian Missiles Shot Down by Ukraine on Friday - Reuters
iRtCSKs.png
 
Last edited:
It's fine, it's fine. We should just let thousands of people die in Ukraine and let Russia START it's expansion.

Made it bigger for you as you are obviously either completely blind, incapable of reading, understanding English or a combination of all 3. I mean could try to make it flash with sirens for you too if that would help :confused:

Who cares how many in the UK die from cold or are financially ruined as long as we get to tell that naughty Pootin off /s......no, infact that needs a huge /S because sadly some folks will think I'm serious.

Seriously, just read what I actually say, it makes conversations much easier and you won't look so silly.
 
Last edited:
I hope Ukraine get a lot more air defense, looks like they got a battering overnight. Can only imagine how miserable it must be to have to sit in an air raid shelter all night and wonder if there is anything left when you go out. :(
 
White House’s Kirby:
- Next Security Assistance Package to Ukraine Coming, Should Expect to See More Air Defense Capabilities
- We Aren’t Seeing Any Indication That There’s an Imminent Move on Kyiv
 
Last edited:
If the Ukrainians produce their own missiles and attack Moscow, go for it.

Supplying them missiles which they can fire at Moscow is considerably different and makes us an active participant in their local war.
In either case, attacking Moscow is I think the wrong move. Just as the attacks on UKR power and infrastructure has hardened UKR resolve, then it follows attacking Moscow will do the the same and will probably increase support for the war.
 
In either case, attacking Moscow is I think the wrong move. Just as the attacks on UKR power and infrastructure has hardened UKR resolve, then it follows attacking Moscow will do the the same and will probably increase support for the war.

Ukraine should be able to take out military targets across Russia ideally, I don't think we'd be gunning for taking out Moscow specifically.

Russia are just shooting civilian targets because they can't beat the military ones.
 
Made it bigger for you as you are obviously either completely blind, incapable of reading, understanding English or a combination of all 3. I mean could try to make it flash with sirens for you too if that would help :confused:



Seriously, just read what I actually say, it makes conversations much easier and you won't look so silly.

You were being facetious, not sarcastic. Hence my reply. Pretty sure I'm not the one looking silly here. Have a great day.
 
*SNIP*

Russia are just shooting civilian targets because they can't beat the military ones.

I was watching a video yesterday where another youtuber was doing an informal interview with Operator Starsky. At one point he said that he didn't think Russia was hitting civilian targets intentionally, and that it was just showing how bad the Russian tech is. I was very surprised to see that Starsky didn't comment about that.

As I see it - opinions vary -, hitting civilian targets is 100% intentional. They are using pretty darn accurate cruise missiles for example and have done for a long time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom