Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 15,991
- Location
- Fareham
I would say we are directly involved in the war - and rightfully so. It was the best chance to prevent all out war.
No it's not direct, we're indirectly involved.
If we were directly involved then our personnel would be on the frontlines, and we'd be a co-belligerent of the conflict and officially at war.
We're not, we're just supplying a lot of support, equipment, training etc.
It's incorrect to say we're totally uninvolved as that's clearly not true, but it's also incorrect to say we're directly involved.