So you believe someone who is arrested for speaking has free speech? In all seriousness that's your actual opinion?
Thank you for demonstrating you dont understand the law in the uk
So you believe someone who is arrested for speaking has free speech? In all seriousness that's your actual opinion?
![]()
Civil liberties groups criticise police over arrests of anti-monarchy protesters
Series of incidents in Edinburgh, London and Oxford include woman being charged after protest outside St Giles’ Cathedralwww.theguardian.com
We arrest a lot of people for really stupid things. I'd love if we had stronger free speech laws, but we don't. People get arrested for retweeting something that caused someone anxiety.
It's good people are calling out Russia, Putin is a gangster, but hold our government to the same standards if you actually value free speech.
Didn't realise the monarchy was in charge nowadays !
Learn something new every day.
Nice apples and pears there though, one group was heckling being a nuisance the other just was a political campaign that went against the 'ruling ' party.
The Monarchy plays an essential role in governing Britain, you may have heard of the term "Royal assent". I guess you did learn something new.
Egypt planned to build and sell ammunition to Russia, USA found out because they know everything and gave Egypt a talking to. Now Egypt build and supplies ammunition to Ukraine instead of Russia
I can already see the pro Russians like Roar will be seething and froathing at the mouth
Thank you for demonstrating you dont understand the law in the uk
Royal Assent is the Monarch's agreement that is required to make a Bill into an Act of Parliament. While the Monarch has the right to refuse Royal Assent, nowadays this does not happen; the last such occasion was in 1708, and Royal Assent is regarded today as a formality.The Monarchy plays an essential role in governing Britain, you may have heard of the term "Royal assent". I guess you did learn something new.
Royal Assent is the Monarch's agreement that is required to make a Bill into an Act of Parliament. While the Monarch has the right to refuse Royal Assent, nowadays this does not happen; the last such occasion was in 1708, and Royal Assent is regarded today as a formality.
In exchange for iran sending russia as much 100mm ammunition as it has, for Russia's t-55 tanks
Think about that, a country that claimed it has essentially unlimited ammunition through decades of preparations for war with the USA, is now begging iran for 100mm ammo so it can use the t-55 as mobile artillery because they've run out of 120, 125 and 155mm ammunition. They also have a lack of replacement barrels for their artillery
The Monarchy plays an essential role in governing Britain, you may have heard of the term "Royal assent". I guess you did learn something new.
Clutching at straws here you very much are hmmm, seems you know your foundations are built on jelly.
Tell me how many bills and laws the monarchy have rejected from parliament ? Or how many they themselves have put through and came to pass in the past 100 years .
1 person charged with a sign that said **** the monarchy , next to a young child. Others warned or de arrested.![]()
Civil liberties groups criticise police over arrests of anti-monarchy protesters
Series of incidents in Edinburgh, London and Oxford include woman being charged after protest outside St Giles’ Cathedralwww.theguardian.com
We arrest a lot of people for really stupid things. I'd love if we had stronger free speech laws, but we don't. People get arrested for retweeting something that caused someone anxiety.
It's good people are calling out Russia, Putin is a gangster, but hold our government to the same standards if you actually value free speech.
I think my actual point was if we arrest people for simply heckling a Monarch then perhaps the UK isn't some bastion of free expression. The Monarchy has a role in government, though obviously King Charles isn't Henry the 8th.
I remember reading about Russia’s tribulations back when they had spare barrels last year. They weren’t lasting anywhere near as long as they were specced to do, and they were warping with the heat of repeated firing. Apparently the spare barrels they had in their stockpiles had been fabricated by a company owned by one of Putin’s client billionaires, and they’d been made out of a much lower grade of steel than specified, with the discrepancy between the cost of manufacture and the price they were sold to the Russian MoD being pocketed, meaning gunners were quoted as saying the warping issue was so bad that firing these guns at a target more than just a few kilometres away would result in the rounds landing 100’s of metres from their intended target.