Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are using pre-war population figures as well
I had to use pre war population figures as there hasn't been an accurate survey of Ukraine's population since 2021, due to the war. Obviously the numbers will be lower than 2021 on both sides, but as the population % of fighting age males has dropped more on the Russian side than the Ukrainian side using unavailable newer data would only skew figures in favour of my point, so I considered it safe to present the calculations without it on that basis.

Though I'm sure some of our Kremlin posters will try to explain to us how calculations done without missing data that would make Russia look worse actually mean Russia is winning :p


We will see how this develops
Putin: This is all part of my strategy, the oil rigs were of no concern, now they must keep troops there to defend them, freeing our troops up to push back their pathetic counteroffensive.
Shoigu: Reports say they flew three Mi-26 helicopters to the rigs.
Putin: Good good, no doubt transporting even more troops that they can't afford to have tied up.
Shoigu: Er, actually boss the Mi-26 were carrying a Patriot, a Gepard and a HIMARS...
Gerasimov: Also the Kerch Bridge is exploding again.
Putin: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU


Iran intends to provide Russia with short- and long-range missiles, - the head of the Israeli intelligence Mossad
The comedy keeps on coming.

Who remembers yesterday when I explained that the NK missiles Putin is after from Kim are just knockoffs of old Soviet Scud missiles which NK bought and reverse engineered into their "domestically produced medium range guided missile"?

Well in addition to the UAE buying a bunch from NK then scrapping them as they were of unusably poor quality, Iran also purchased some, which they reverse engineered into their "domestically produced medium range guided missile".

So the missiles Putin is looking to source from Iran, are a cheap/crappy Iranian knock off, of a cheap/crappy North Korea knock off, of a Soviet missile Russia retired years ago and replaced with the Tochka missile, which is currently being replaced by the Iskander missile.

Is this what Winning looks like Roar? :p
 
Last edited:
I have to assume he does it because of the responses he gets, if people just ignored him and didn't reply then he'd probably get bored of peddling his nonsensical views.
There are two problems with that.

1: If you leave misinformation unchallenged and unrefuted, that is how misinformation best spread on the internet.
2: Ironically, over the past couple of months most of the higher quality/informative posts in this thread have been the ones correcting his misinformation and explaining the truth in depth. Comically without him this thread would be much lower quality and mostly just Twitter embeds.
 
There are two problems with that.

1: If you leave misinformation unchallenged and unrefuted, that is how misinformation best spread on the internet.
2: Ironically, over the past couple of months most of the higher quality/informative posts in this thread have been the ones correcting his misinformation and explaining the truth in depth. Comically without him this thread would be much lower quality and mostly just Twitter embeds.

The group think in here is absolutely mental. You all believe Ukraine are winning a war when there's graph showing that year to date they've retaken the same amount of land they lost earlier in the year. So tens of thousands of dead young men amounting to a net gain in land of zero

But I'm spreading misinformation lmao
 
Last edited:
The group think in here is absolutely mental. You all believe Ukraine are winning a war when there's graph showing that year to date they've retaken the same amount of land they lost earlier in the year. So tens of thousands of dead young men amounting to a net gain in land of zero
The Ukranian counter offensive has reduced Russian offensive operations to ineffectual feints at this point and appears to be effectively wearing down their artillery and armour capabilities.

I think it would be bold to assess the counter offensive only in terms of land gained as there will likely be a tipping point where Russian capabilities are reduced to the point where larger gains will be possible or Russia calls it a day.

Ukraine is steadily moving to break the coastal supply line which really makes the whole of Crimea very ropey to hold on to for Russia.
 
Last edited:
The Ukranian counter offensive has reduced Russian offensive operations to ineffectual feints at this point and appears to be effectively wearing down their artillery and armour capabilities.

I think it would be bold to assess the counter offensive only in terms of land gained as there will likely be a tipping point where Russian capabilities are reduced to the point where larger gains will be possible or Russia calls it a day.

Ukraine is steadily moving to break the coastal supply line which really makes the whole of Crimea very ropey to hold on to for Russia.
Roar is a facsinating subject.

Please continue :)
 
Interesting article about Russia attempting to restart T-80 production from scratch:


They seem to be in a bit of a spin at the moment trying to find a replacement for the T-90 and T-14 which obviously aren't working out for them.

EDIT: I'd hazard these might end up with Chinese diesel engines rather than the original gas turbine and have several other parts off the shelf from the likes of Iran or China different to the original T-80s - I also doubt it will be as prohibitive as the mentioned American assessment of restarting tank production at a cost of over a billion and taking 56 months being a war time development.
 
Last edited:
The group think in here is absolutely mental. You all believe Ukraine are winning a war when there's graph showing that year to date they've retaken the same amount of land they lost earlier in the year. So tens of thousands of dead young men amounting to a net gain in land of zero


But I'm spreading misinformation lmao
Does holding land mean your winning? - At the end off WW1 Germany held far more land than it did at the start of the war. For most of WW2 Germany had more land area than it started with but they were losing certainly from 1943 onwards.

Russia has given up on an invasion before in Afghanistan and it wasn't costing them as much as this war Ukraine doesn't need to win, just needs to make it too painful for Russia to stay, how long that will take - I don't know.

For both countries, that had declining populations before the war, this really hasn't helped their long term survival.
 
Does holding land mean your winning? - At the end off WW1 Germany held far more land than it did at the start of the war. For most of WW2 Germany had more land area than it started with but they were losing certainly from 1943 onwards.

I think when your goal is to annex that land then if you're holding it you are winning, yes.

Russia has given up on an invasion before in Afghanistan and it wasn't costing them as much as this war Ukraine doesn't need to win, just needs to make it too painful for Russia to stay, how long that will take - I don't know.

Afghanistan wasn't on their doorstep, this land is important to them because of the strategic importance of Russia having access to the Black Sea.

For both countries, that had declining populations before the war, this really hasn't helped their long term survival.

Yeah I agree, it's very bad for both countries. Neither of them are gaining anything out of fighting at this point.
 
Something I've been thinking about in light of recent developments/statements from Russia, etc. over the years I've played several persistent/massive multi-player games online which have a sizeable and quite closed ranks and insular Russian presence such as Eve Online and everyone else was basically NATO/the West in effect, in the past I've always seen it kind of innocently like a role playing thing, but now looking back it takes on a far more sinister aspect - I think the anti-West sentiment was a lot more deep rooted and much more how they actually think than I thought at the time.


This is a curious one - Russia probably feels a bit naked in that direction given how much they drew down forces there but one thing this war has reinforced is that things haven't really moved on since WW2 in respect to the commitment of soldiers and equipment to invade countries and siege cities against any moderately capable force, let alone a country like Finland which has a determined and prepared defensive force and terrain which heavily favours the defenders. If you aren't throwing million man armies at it then things don't exactly go well.
 
Last edited:
A Ural Airlines plane flying from Sochi to Omsk had to make an emergency landing near Novosibirsk. There are 170 passengers on board, including 23 children.

The plane transmitted an emergency message, claiming the plane's hydraulics had failed, pilots said they would land on a runway at Novosibirsk. The plane then disappeared from radar but Russian news reports the plane did an emergency landing in a field, no word of injuries


 
Last edited:
A Ural Airlines plane flying from Sochi to Omsk had to make an emergency landing near Novosibirsk. There are 170 passengers on board, including 23 children.

The plane transmitted an emergency message, claiming the plane's hydraulics had failed, pilots said they would land on a runway at Novosibirsk. The plane then disappeared from radar but Russian news reports the plane did an emergency landing in a field, no word of injuries


Lack of spares and maintenance starting to cause problems? I don't think I would like to fly on a Russian airline now.
 
Lack of spares and maintenance starting to cause problems? I don't think I would like to fly on a Russian airline now.

A lot of special purpose aircraft being used in Russia for other/general purposes which is telling. Albeit some like the Open Skies treaty aircraft are now redundant in their original roles.
 
The group think in here is absolutely mental. You all believe Ukraine are winning a war when there's graph showing that year to date they've retaken the same amount of land they lost earlier in the year. So tens of thousands of dead young men amounting to a net gain in land of zero


But I'm spreading misinformation lmao

If you look at how the land has changed. Basically Russia swept in, they grabbed loads of land from an at best semi prepared defense. They also already had large chunks ready to be handed over / supported by partisans to Russia.
Lets not forget footage of border guards being the only defence against a column of troops.
Ukraine countered and took a decent chunk back.
Throughout the summer of 22 Ukraine were getting themselves slowly back on the right track. Late 22 you had of course the counter attack.
Winter 23 Wagner slowly ground their way across Bahkmut. Not the Russian army.
Late spring 23 Wagner were done. And Ukraine finally started to get what they needed, the delayed summer offensive is only at that point starting to attack well fortified positions.

The last time the Russian army made any ground of any note was March 22. If you follow the channel such as I linked where he checks the Russian activities thats not for trying on their part. They would launch 40-50 combat missions a day. This is now reduced to around half that.

Its upto the countries leader, as it always has been (well leader back to times like cavemen) in order to decide if they fight for what is theirs, not just fold like a cheap Trump "made in chinaaa" Tshirt.
History has told us that giving up never ends well for your population.
Its partly the reason when electing your leaders you need to avoid people like Corbyn who will NOT do whats right should you end up in a situation like this.
Generally the more extreme right and more extreme left will let you down in this area, like they will in most other areas.

This was expected, just its taking longer than expected to break through. The slow pace is likely meaning the Russian are re-mining as they fall back. I think many analysts expected a heavier breakthrough. Carried away with how "the west" would do it having fought for ages, potentially, for air supremacy.
IMO this would be going far easier if Ukraine could create some pockets of air superiority in areas to support a more sustained breakthrough.

No one knows for sure (outside those who really know) but the majority of the analysis shows Russias capabilities being constantly reduced. Well trained and professional troops being heavily worn down. (Stuff like VDV being sent into defending trenches to hold lines), older and older equipment showing up at the front lines. The trainers as well in many cases being sent to fight themselves. Training ranges having no ammo, etc etc.
Whilst Ukraine is constantly being refreshed with more equipment, better equipment. Their troops are mainly getting training in places with the best forces in the world. Whilst that training is only basic its better than the conscripted Russians are getting.
A lot of Ukraines forces are still using old training (which actually is why they revert to closer to Soviet methodology) and old soviet equipment. Many of the more elite Ukrainian forces are in this position as they were already formed, the newer formed units getting sent for Western training and getting fully equipped with western arms, and western equipment.

The Ukrainian troops are mainly motivated by defending their lands, and in their minds righting wrongs committed by the invading Russians. The Russians are in many cases heavily demotivated, getting no rotation etc
How do we know a lot of this, intercepted Russian calls are available on youtube where much of the stuff above comes from their own troops.

Your not wrong in that its a massive and terrible waste of human life. You are wrong if you think its possible to negotiate in good faith with Putin, a perpetual liar with no regard for the international law, or good moral compass.
Everyone is all ears on how this ends non militarily without capitulation and giving up loads of land. Or with giving Ukraine what they need to push Russia well back.
Maybe they will come to the table at some point. Its certainly possible that they will again take some big chunks back.
Talk is now that a winter offensive which suits mechanised may well be on the cards. People get fixated that it would be like Stalingrad where the Germans were in sight but couldn't get there. Ukraine does suffer bad weather for sure, but its not the same challenge as it was then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom