I did.
That doesn't make it any less what I said it is.
If you bend over for Putin and Tucker any further, you'll be in danger of breaking your own spine.
To be honest, I thought he would be quite aggressive and ask so-called tough questions.
I was not just prepared for this, I wanted it, because it would give me the opportunity to respond with equally sharp answers, which would add a certain character to our conversation. But he chose a different tactic. He tried to interrupt me several times, but still, surprisingly for a Western journalist, he remained patient and listened to my lengthy monologues, especially when I spoke about history. He gave me no cause for doing what I was prepared to do. That is why, to tell the truth, I did not fully enjoy that interview. But he acted strictly according to his plan, and he did what he intended. As for how informative it turned out to be in the end, that is not for me to judge. It is for the viewers, listeners and possibly readers of this material to judge.
The entire answer reads quite entirely differently to your Twitter post. Which is why as I said earlier, most of what is posted here from Twitter is simply pure misinformation from literal Ukrainian propaganda accounts that are often taking money in the form of donations. They're basically encouraging continued Western support for the war, leading it to drag out costing lives, while they sit at home and profit from running a Twitter account spewing out misinformation
Last edited: