Soldato
Stugna-P videos never get old
Oof. Sending those T-62’s into the frontline in the face of an opponent armed with the likes of Javelin, NLAW, and AT-4’s, plus tanks that are a generation or more ahead of the of T62 is akin to throwing baby Barn Owls into a running industrial fan.
Remarkably effective bit of kit. Seems remarkably effective in open terrain. The clip where they hit a hovering KA-50 was pretty legendary.Stugna-P videos never get old
Weapons and heavy weapons are not the same thing. I wish Germany would be more rapid and active in sending heavy weapons (and that the Swiss weren't blocking stuff, and that the French would step up more, etc.) but it's just not true that Germany haven't sent any weapons, millions of rounds of ammunition, rifles, anti-tank weapons, grenades, etc. have all been sent, along with ammunition for the howitzers sent by Holland. Germany did follow decades of established policy in rejecting initial transfer requests, but that was swiftly reversed within days of the war starting, as were rules preventing Germany sending direct military aid.
Like many of Western Europe's leaders, Scholz is clear that his top priority is preventing an escalation into a war between NATO and Russia, well ahead of ensuring that Ukraine wins. That doesn't mean that Germany is doing nothing.
This is the most up to date chart of military aid I can find:
A breakdown of some of the German deliveries is on Wikipedia
"#Switzerland has banned #Germany from supplying #Ukraine with Swiss-made ammunition The veto concerns, among other things, ammunition for the "Gepard" self-propelled air defense systems, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs said, citing the country's neutrality."
This is somewhat ridiculous. If they were neutral, they wouldn't sell weapons in the first place. Now they are trying to dictate where/when they are used /facepalm.
^^ This tweet is from April, but it still baffles me, as it is related to the German supply of weapons to Ukraine.
I takes a long time to negotiate these things and it is never simply black and white. Germany wanted to send the Gepard but could not because the Oerlikon cannons it uses are a Swiss design, that use Swiss supplied ammunition. So they had to seek an alternative source for the ammunition.
It's much easier for many (not you) to post memes about Germany = bad and UK = good. Yet we can all see the bulk of the weapon and financial support comes from the USA. As usual the EU/UK are slow to act with mostly rhetoric. "We will fight them on the beaches... with American weapons".
I takes a long time to negotiate these things and it is never simply black and white. Germany wanted to send the Gepard but could not because the Oerlikon cannons it uses are a Swiss design, that use Swiss supplied ammunition. So they had to seek an alternative source for the ammunition.
It's much easier for many (not you) to post memes about Germany = bad and UK = good. Yet we can all see the bulk of the weapon and financial support comes from the USA. As usual the EU/UK are slow to act with mostly rhetoric. "We will fight them on the beaches... with American weapons".
No it isn't. The US has superior ability to project power but the European military machine is far from weak.Yeah the US has this massive advantage of being a military and economic super power able to fight Russia and China on it's own if push came to shove, Europe is pretty weak militarily.
Switzerland have since granted permission for various systems and ammo to be sent to Ukraine - they are no longer claiming to be neutral."#Switzerland has banned #Germany from supplying #Ukraine with Swiss-made ammunition The veto concerns, among other things, ammunition for the "Gepard" self-propelled air defense systems, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs said, citing the country's neutrality."
This is somewhat ridiculous. If they were neutral, they wouldn't sell weapons in the first place. Now they are trying to dictate where/when they are used /facepalm.
^^ This tweet is from April, but it still baffles me, as it is related to the German supply of weapons to Ukraine.
https://deepstatemap.live/en#6/49.438/32.053
Ukraine has managed to regain about 90% of the remains of Severodonetsk according to the situation map at Deep State. If this is accurate it will hopefully give Ukraine some breathing room to bring up further western artillery and these new ROCKET systems.
As usual the EU/UK are slow to act with mostly rhetoric. "We will fight them on the beaches... with American weapons".
Very true. The US has an absolute ridiculous military budget. Dwarfs everyone.I disagree with this as the UK sent NLAW's (not a US weapon) a month before the Russians invaded at the same time that the US sent Javelins. Granted the EU has been slower, mainly as the various countries waited to see if the invasion would take place in the first place but some EU nations sent anti-tank weaponry (not US weapons) within a few days of the invasion starting. Since the invasion the UK has supplied various types of non-US weaponry (Starstreak, Martel etc) alongside more NLAW's and the EU has provided lots of non-US weaponry too.
As someone else mentioned, the reason that graph is so skewed is that the US, with a defence budget $810 Billion (approx 1100% more than the UK spends) has huge stockpile of weapons it can give away such as 90 M777 artillery pieces (50% more artillery than the total UK army has!!), whilst the UK and EU don't have the money to build stockpiles like that.
Not the right battle to 'win'. Either win at Pospasna and Sloviansk or loose the whole area.https://deepstatemap.live/en#6/49.438/32.053
Ukraine has managed to regain about 90% of the remains of Severodonetsk according to the situation map at Deep State. If this is accurate it will hopefully give Ukraine some breathing room to bring up further western artillery and these new missile systems.