Agreed.Jono said:I agree, although I would go so far as to say that people should be encouraged to learn english just to be here.
Agreed.Jono said:I agree, although I would go so far as to say that people should be encouraged to learn english just to be here.
Oh the ironing.triggerthat said:Whenever I buy something, half the time I get served by someone who cannot hardly speak English. Not helpful.
fatiain said:Oh the ironing.
AJUK said:If they can't speak English they shouldn't even be here let alone be claiming unemployment benefit.![]()
scorza said:Nice idea in principle, in practice all it will mean is more government dosh for the corrupt language schools.
Your company should employ some of the 1.6 million unemployed native Brits rather than Poles and then you wouldn't have the problem in the first place.MNuTz said:one of my polish lads has had the afternoon off lately to go to an english lesson, provided free by the government.
The big boss told my supervisor that if he had time off work again to go that he would face a disciplinary for it, that really ****** me off. We struggle at work with communication anyway, a problem that many of the supervisory staff have put forward and they promise to try and sort it. When one of the lads does something about it he faces a warning or the sack.
Lets just say that i made my boss feel quite small by the time i had pointed all this out, dont think i will be getting that promotion though.![]()
AJUK said:Your company should employ some of the 1.6 million unemployed native Brits rather than Poles and then you wouldn't have the problem in the first place.
Then perhaps the government should be spending the money on actively promoting and encouraging the unemployed Brits to do the work instead of spending the money on language lessons for foreigners that are only here to earn a quick buck that is sent back home to keep the peasants over there.MNuTz said:We dont get many applications from Brits though, those that do usually get a job. According to the HR girl we get about 2 brit applications a month, compared to about 200 polish ones.
I dont care what language they speak, as long as they have basic english, learn fast, and are accurate in their pickings.
AJUK said:Then perhaps the government should be spending the money on actively promoting and encouraging the unemployed Brits to do the work instead of spending the money on language lessons for foreigners that are only here to earn a quick buck that is sent back home to keep the peasants over there.
Fair enough but we shouldn't be spending it on language lessons for foreigners either!wordy said:Hmm I don't agree that we should be spending money to get lazy British people off the dole and working for a living. We should be threatening to stop benfits of those who can work but choose to scrounge.
Agree with the rest of what you said though![]()
AJUK said:Then perhaps the government should be spending the money on actively promoting and encouraging the unemployed Brits to do the work instead of spending the money on language lessons for foreigners that are only here to earn a quick buck that is sent back home to keep the peasants over there.
AJUK said:Fair enough but we shouldn't be spending it on language lessons for foreigners either!
Dolph said:Sounds totally reasonable to me, should have been implemented a long time ago.
I don't advocate forcing people to learn a language just to be here, but if they expect state support, it's an entirely reasonable proposition.
AJUK said:I know lots of foreigners and as I have been running my own business for seven years I shall take no advice from you on employment issues.
In response to the other issue, yes I do stand up for Brits first, what's wrong with that?
Isn't that exactly the same when people use "positive discrimination" in employment, for example with race quotas in the police force?MNuTz said:Because you don't know them, your standing up for them based only on their race. The majority of the people you are standing up for could be criminals, drug users or just plain lazy sods, none of which deserve your support.
VIRII said:Isn't that exactly the same when people use "positive discrimination" in employment, for example with race quotas in the police force?
Being British isn't a race, it's a nationality.MNuTz said:ooo well good for you! Seeing as you run your own company you must be an expert on employment!
Because you don't know them, your standing up for them based only on their race. The majority of the people you are standing up for could be criminals, drug users or just plain lazy sods, none of which deserve your support.
As an employer, you know that the jobs are out there, they where out there before all the foreigners started flooding the country. If the brits wanted to work so badly, why did we have such high unemployment before?
If we have an open border policy and not put her indigenous population first then country will collapse, both socially and economically.MNuTz said:no, all im doing is trying to show that he is sticking up for people who he doesnt know purely based on race. Im just saying that they 'could' be people like that.
I will admit that there are unemployed brits who are desperate to get work, and im sure some of the foreigners who come over are lazy drug taking criminals. However, my point is that we should only judge the people we know and not stick up for those we dont.
When i get a new staff member, whether they are foreign or english i dont sterotype them. I judge them on how hard they work and how accurate they are. I dont give two hoots what race you are.