-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Unigine Heaven 4 benchmark
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Last edited:
Associate
i3570k @ 4.4
295x2 @ 1018/1600 -50mv +35 power
about 100 points improvement from before.
295x2 @ 1018/1600 -50mv +35 power
about 100 points improvement from before.
Some nice increases, Scoreboard updated.
Right in at #10. Nice one!
You have anything left in the tank at those speeds?
Associate
5930k @ 4.45
3x R9 290 Tri-x Watercooled @1182/1500
14.4
Couldnt help myself.
3x R9 290 Tri-x Watercooled @1182/1500
14.4
Couldnt help myself.
5930k @ 4.45
3x R9 290 Tri-x Watercooled @1182/1500
14.4
Couldnt help myself.
And on the scoreboard.
Associate
Associate
Associate
Thought I better get in on this before all the boys with next gen hardware roll in, besides it was a good excuse to warm up the new loop.
i7-4820k @4.7GHz water
GTX780 @1241/1728 x2 water
JR
i7-4820k @4.7GHz water
GTX780 @1241/1728 x2 water
JR
Last edited:
Caporegime
Finally broke 3000, all fans in system to max and windows open.
i7 4790k @4.7ghz, air cooled
Gtx 780 sli, air cooled
Gpu1, 1202/3305
Gpu2, 1176/3305
i7 4790k @4.7ghz, air cooled
Gtx 780 sli, air cooled
Gpu1, 1202/3305
Gpu2, 1176/3305
Last edited:
Caporegime
1.300 vcore, 1.800 eventual input voltage, (known as vrin on gigabyte boards) 1.200 on sa and ioa and iod voltages. Ram on XMP of 2400 mhz, 10-11-11-31, 2T 1.65v. Cache/uncore clock at stock of 4000mhz. SVID disabled in bios. The important thing to remember with haswell clocking is that input voltage should be at least 0.5v higher than vcore. Some of the terms in bios may be labeled different on your board from what asus calls them.
Scoreboards updated.
It won't count.
But it is an interesting score and pretty good for stock.
I would have figured a 970 at those clocks to beat the average OC 780?
Is it because of new drivers?
Compared to the couple of 980 scores I have seen it looks to be about right.
whyscotty got 1893 with a 980. It is quite easy comparing the two cards on this bench as it is all about graphics performance.
Providing both cards are using about the same clocks all you have to do is divide the 970 score by 13 and multiply by 16 (number of cores in use).
1555/13 = 119.615
*16 = 1913.846
Having said all that I think the drivers will improve a bit too.
Compared to the couple of 980 scores I have seen it looks to be about right.
whyscotty got 1893 with a 980. It is quite easy comparing the two cards on this bench as it is all about graphics performance.
Providing both cards are using about the same clocks all you have to do is divide the 970 score by 13 and multiply by 16 (number of cores in use).
1555/13 = 119.615
*16 = 1913.846
Having said all that I think the drivers will improve a bit too.
I was talking about the 780 compared to the 970. Not the 980.
I was just expecting a well overclocked 970 to easily beat a mild OC 780. According to most reviews I read, the 970 seems to be beating the 780.
Those are very good scores for the 970 and 980, don't forget a lot of the 780s and 780ti's in that chart are using custom bios', big volts and watercooling or better. All these things are yet to be used on the 970/80 but when they are it will be very interesting.