No very different.
When you run 3dmark11 (performance preset) can you also post the link to the results please.
Edit 3dmark11 is a free download but you can only use the performance preset.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Unigine Heaven 4 benchmark
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
No very different.
When you run 3dmark11 (performance preset) can you also post the link to the results please.
Edit 3dmark11 is a free download but you can only use the performance preset.
Permabanned
Ok will do. Busy ATM but will post tonight.
Permabanned
Caporegime
Permabanned
Very nice but wrong thread
Kaapstad wanted me to post this score. I thought he went here
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Feb 2013
- Posts
- 5
I have a few questions that I hope you guys can help me with. I am using a GTX 680 with a i7 3770K. I have everything running at stock clock speeds.
1. Does this benchmark seem about right for my setup?
2. For benchmarking, I turn vsync off. Do you guys get screen tearing during this benchmark? I notice it throughout. The first scene with the cobblestone is particularly noticeable.
3. When I alt+tab out and reopen the benchmark in windowed mode, the tearing goes away. However, my final score is lower but not anywhere near as low as turning on vsync in full screen. Why is that?
4. I don't understand the way the clock speeds are written. For example, "GTX 680 1110/1536/1276/." I understand that the first number is the core clock. Why is the memory clock cut in half? What is the third number?
5. I'm noticing that a lot of the GTX 680 overclocks seem relatively mild. Is there a noticeable gain by overclocking the core clock speeds from the stock 1097 MHz to 1110 MHz?
Any information is greatly appreciated!
Can anyone help me with these questions?
Caporegime
Score looks fine for stock GPU and CPU to me.
Those overclocks are a little weak and I would hope to hit 1200Mhz on the core and around +400 on the memory. You will see some nice improvements in games and minimums will be improved in more demanding games.
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
I am at work at the moment
Can you download and install driver 306.23 this is the best driver for a GTX 690.
Then rerun 3dmark11
At the moment your score is very low even at stock speeds.
Can you also post a screenshot of GPUz showing the clock speeds please.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2012
- Posts
- 244
Been Playing with the OC's
900/1350 @ 1.175
Not too bad for what it is.... And for 1gb cards!
900/1350 @ 1.175
Not too bad for what it is.... And for 1gb cards!
Last edited:
Could you post a screenshot with result please to get on the scoreboard.
Could you post a screenshot with result please to get on the scoreboard.
Also more details about your card. If it is a HD 6 series I would really like to get it on the scoreboard.
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2008
- Posts
- 6,004
Kaapstad wanted me to post this score. I thought he went here
If it helps debugging an issue, I just ran 3dmark with score of P14657, same card (690)and same processor although my CPU is running a little bit slower. Link below
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6001682
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2012
- Posts
- 244
Just had to re-run to get the screen shot - slightly higher!
They are these cards - http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/EAH6950_DCII2DI4S1GD5/
With an unlocked 960t.
Permabanned
I wonder why that is? What drivers you on?
Permabanned
here you go mate. I've oc the card a little, but even at stock it's a little lower then the score I gave earlier? My card is slow for some reason?
Last edited:
Permabanned
I'll run 3dmark11 now
Last edited: