Unigine OpenGL/Direct3D9 Benchmark

BubbySoup · 29 Jun 2007 at 12:34

I take a massive hit when I enable blur, DOF & HDR on my X-Fired X1900's, down from a respectable 2239 using the OP settings, to 550

Guess an upgrade is called for at the end of the year on the next core refresh

helmutcheese · 29 Jun 2007 at 12:36

Nvidia do have 2D and 3D seperate clocks on 8800's.

eracer2006 · 29 Jun 2007 at 12:39

I think i might have to go for 3.2ghz......

willhub · 29 Jun 2007 at 13:17

I notice the HD2900XT's aint getting as good as 8800's in this benchmark.

ergonomics · 29 Jun 2007 at 13:20

interesting results. i just ran it on my 8800 640 and it runs very well. im pleased to have a benchmark i can succeed in!

Paracelsus · 29 Jun 2007 at 18:15

edit: wrong resolution

sunlitsix · 29 Jun 2007 at 19:28

so this raped my 7600GT, its certainly showing its old age now

oh and HDR wouldnt enable (not with AA enabled anyway)

and with no AA but HDR enabled

titaniumx3 · 30 Jun 2007 at 02:29

X2 4400+/X1900XT 512mb

Not bad, but I'm thinking for certain cards, things are more optimised than others. Also, maybe it's just my card, but some of the effects looked ghastly, in particular the motion blur and depth of field.

EDIT: Come to think of it the scores reflect pretty well on the capability of the cards. So far, going by the scores posted it seems:

4 x 7600GT = 2 x X1900XT = 8800GTX

Which is fairly accurate. It's only the 2900XT that's out of place.

Rroff · 30 Jun 2007 at 03:53

titaniumx3 said:
4 x 7600GT = 2 x X1900XT = 8800GTX

Which is fairly accurate. It's only the 2900XT that's out of place.

And nVidia 7 series cards - seems a lot of effects are rendered in software with them for some reason dropping the fps considerably...

Raikiri · 30 Jun 2007 at 04:39

7800GT really showing its age, not too bad I suppose

My windows install is terrible too, could probably add 3-5FPS to that with a clean install.

DirectX:

OpenGL:

e6300 @ 2.8ghz
2x1gb ddr2 @ 800mhz

and so on

straxusii · 30 Jun 2007 at 06:22

jaykay said:
If its windowed it may go to 2d clocks but nvidias dont have them only ATI.

I use rivatuner so I do have a slower clock in 2d than 3d, I'll retry full screen

Edit: locks up when I try and go full screen

Raves · 30 Jun 2007 at 10:42

1280x1024, 4XAA 16XAF, all maximum settings

d3d: 67.3
ogl: 64.5

8800 GTS 640 MB, X2 4600+ @ 2.5Ghz, 2GB RAM, winXP

Indy500 · 30 Jun 2007 at 10:52

Will this work with a Geforce 4 Ti4400?

Andric · 30 Jun 2007 at 12:15

x1950pro 512 agp(ccc overclocked), p4 [email protected], 2 gig ram, xp pro

some bad pixelation in shadows in both benches

opengl:
41.1, score 872

dx9:
47.5, score 1006
(@1680x1050 native +hdr scored 28.9/613)
1280x1024 4xaa full screen, settings all as origial poster

that machine is still my main games & dev box so i keep it very clean so bare minimum running in background etc, and quite heavily oc'd on air(zalman coolers on cpu and vcard)

dan1987 · 1 Jul 2007 at 00:34

2900xt stock

overclocked to 860/1000

Biglunn · 1 Jul 2007 at 12:27

Just downloaded this demo, and I have to say that its quite nice.

But there is a setting that really impressed me - something called DOF (not sure what it means). It kinda puts one part of the picture into focus - nice and sharp - with others at different distances out of focus, very lifelike. This could add more realism to games.

juno_first · 1 Jul 2007 at 13:40

Sorry chaps my native resolution is 1360x768 which is not supported, though I could run 1280x1024 4xAA in a window @1920x1080 desktop:

ergonomics · 1 Jul 2007 at 13:44

Biglunn said:
Just downloaded this demo, and I have to say that its quite nice.

But there is a setting that really impressed me - something called DOF (not sure what it means). It kinda puts one part of the picture into focus - nice and sharp - with others at different distances out of focus, very lifelike. This could add more realism to games.

Depth Of Field, newer games are going to use it like crysis. just lots of nice eye candy, but it can make some people "car sick"!

Greenboi · 1 Jul 2007 at 13:58

ergonomics said:
Depth Of Field, newer games are going to use it like crysis. just lots of nice eye candy, but it can make some people "car sick"!

Yeah i dont like DOF, i prefer it off and to have a sharper image in the distance, personal preference...also seems to bring fps down a fair bit when its on

Jono8 · 1 Jul 2007 at 14:27

Biglunn said:
Just downloaded this demo, and I have to say that its quite nice.

But there is a setting that really impressed me - something called DOF (not sure what it means). It kinda puts one part of the picture into focus - nice and sharp - with others at different distances out of focus, very lifelike. This could add more realism to games.

yeh i think its a fantastic efefct too. Looks great in call of juarez.