Universal basic income to be trialled

We have played this game before, not with robots and automation but with the proles, the elimination of bourgeoisie and the supposed collective ownership of the means of production.

It didn't work out well then and it won't again if tried in a more modern iteration because such necessarily totalitarian systems always fall foul of human nature. With the most ruthless and dangerous of people all to often rising to power.

The world where everyone receives UBI and is at leisure to pursue the hearts content is rather a remote possibility compared to the possibility of a world where automation makes most humans redundant and therefore targets to be liquidated by thoose controlling the machines.
The collective dictatorship sounded kind of bad in the first half but the second half where we're being hunted down by killer robots for sport seems worse somehow. :cry:
 
First, we'll have to find a way to stop government policy being set by the rich and powerful... Those with the most power and share of the world's assets today, do not want to give it up. Nor their seats at the top tables, 'influencing' the political establishment.

Repeatedly electing the Tories probably doesn't help with that.

If you believe politicians have gained control of the money supply, or will do over the next decade. They are far more likely to give citizens money, why wouldn't they? it keeps them in power.
Russell Napier has spoken about this extensively over the last number of years, that's why he thinks the next decade will be far more inflationary than deflationary.
 
Last edited:
You don't necessarily print the money though. You fund UBI through much higher taxation


It doesn't even need to be higher taxation for most. A flat rate 60% tax would stilll leave the majority of people better off combined with UBI. The tax burden would just be shifted to higher earners/corporations.

It would also save a fortune on schemes like UC, PIP etc. as they just wouldn't be required.

An income of £44,300 (as of 2021) puts you in the 80th percentile of earners in the UK. A take home of £34,146. On a flat 60% tax with UBI it's £36,920.

Someone on minimum wage would go from £17,800 after tax to £26,300 - about £13.50 an hour.

It'll be interesting to see the outcome, iirc some countries (Nordic?) have already done this. The unemployed will have less incentive for work and a proportion of them will have more money for weed, gambling, and cigarettes.

Read any study on UBI and it shows an increase in productivity. Every time.

 
I am working with a guy now who owns multiple holiday let's but just needs work to socialise, he talks football all day, pretty sure I could fill my time better (I do 30 hrs now)
My step dad is like that. My parents are sat on so much cash but he still works himself into the grave. Many people need purpose. Be it kids, or a career etc. Which is fine. But take career away and many will probably succumb to mental health issues through lack of purpose
 
You don't lose the UBI if you work.

Say you get your £1600 UBI. You then get a shelf stacking job, and you get 21k a year ON TOP of your UBI.....so the incentive to work is still there.

If anything, it really incentivises people to fill these low paid jobs because you can actually have a good standard of living on them.

If the government are seriously considering UBI then they must think there is big trouble ahead. AI means that a large chunk of the degree-level educated middle class are going to be thrown on the scrapheap at some point. Our legal commitment to net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 will also take out a large chunk of middle/working class occupations and require people to reduce their standard of living.

Hence UBI will be an easy way to top up the incomes of people who had well paid careers (without the stigma of being on benefits) while they do poorly paid manual labour jobs which the robots cannot do. The Conservative government knows it cannot get away with jettisoning a huge group of previously prosperous middle/working class people from marginal constituencies in middle/southern England in the way they did with the communities of miners/steel workers/ship builders etc in the Red Wall of the north of England.
 
If the government are seriously considering UBI then they must think there is big trouble ahead. AI means that a large chunk of the degree-level educated middle class are going to be thrown on the scrapheap at some point. Our legal commitment to net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 will also take out a large chunk of middle/working class occupations and require people to reduce their standard of living.

Hence UBI will be an easy way to top up the incomes of people who had well paid careers (without the stigma of being on benefits) while they do poorly paid manual labour jobs which the robots cannot do. The Conservative government knows it cannot get away with jettisoning a huge group of previously prosperous middle/working class people from marginal constituencies in middle/southern England in the way they did with the communities of miners/steel workers/ship builders etc in the Red Wall of the north of England.
How does that work? Because both cheesefest and I would then be paid the same?
 
We won't need shelf stackers as shopping will be totally automated to your door. Bad news for train drivers who may have been thinking of that to top up their UBI.
Any kind of job that requires thought can be done by A.I.

Customer service will be replaced, accountants, graphic designers, investment banking or finance, teaching, market research, lawyers and I.T.

Those jobs that robot can do will be at risk and those that can’t be will not.
 
It's about time, Tomorrow's World promised that we'd all be free to relax and have fun by now

I mean who lays on their deathbed wishing they'd worked more, done more overtime or recalls all those memorable times by the watercooler?
I remember those days.

We were told we'd all have a robot that would go out and do our work for us :D

I'm sure we'll eventually get a robot. But I'm sure the government will find a way to screw us financially.
 
If the government are seriously considering UBI then they must think there is big trouble ahead.

Yes, and ours is not the only government to think this.

For me, it's a case of "whatever". The devil will be in the detail. At the moment it all seems nuts, but they are obviously planning for something that I don't see.
 
My step dad is like that. My parents are sat on so much cash but he still works himself into the grave. Many people need purpose. Be it kids, or a career etc. Which is fine. But take career away and many will probably succumb to mental health issues through lack of purpose
My dad was the same. He took early retirement with a really nice golden handshake and then found himself in a mental hell hole.
He went from being responsible for 100s of staff to nothing over night and he simply couldn't handle it :/
 
My dad was the same. He took early retirement with a really nice golden handshake and then found himself in a mental hell hole.
He went from being responsible for 100s of staff to nothing over night and he simply couldn't handle it :/

I enjoyed the 43 years I spent as a civil engineer however when the time came I was ready to find something different. Meaning currently making a garden and doing up the house. I don't need holidays in the sun, a few days spent away in the UK is enough. I had a lot of responsibility at work but was able to walk away and shrug it off relatively easily.
 
The UBI proposed in the OP if truly rolled out, would change the UK forever for the worse imo. I think we need to be looking more in the complete opposite direction, i.e. Scrapping all benefits.

How exactly would plunging a couple million people into abject poverty help?
 
The UBI proposed in the OP if truly rolled out, would change the UK forever for the worse imo. I think we need to be looking more in the complete opposite direction, i.e. Scrapping all benefits.
So how does that work? Is it a "short sharp shock" to reset the system, or are we just leaving a few millions to starve on the street?
 
How exactly would plunging a couple million people into abject poverty help?

It would help the UK in the long term when people realise they can't be work shy, scroungers anymore. That would be the primary objective.

So how does that work? Is it a "short sharp shock" to reset the system, or are we just leaving a few millions to starve on the street?

Phased over time would be more realistic.
If you don't contribute to society and are physically/mentally able to work, why should you get handouts?
 
Back
Top Bottom