Using competitor products in the office

I imagine the encouragement is there in the form of free/discounted stuff, but that 'encouragement' shouldn't turn to policy unless it's a customer-facing role e.g. sales like you say.

Agreed. I just believe that most roles can be customer facing - particularly if you're bringing customers in to your offices ...
 
I work for Haribo and we all eat Haribos here. Doesn't mean we're restricted to just our own brand, I actually encourage everyone to try others and feedback, so we can compare and keep competitive.

Same is the case with using company's own brand vs competitor's electronic. Forcing everyone to conform for the sake of marketing image don't trump flexibility and competitiveness. I probably think like so as I work in R&D rather than Marketing.
 
I meant they wouldn't have a subsidised one. The cleaner is unlikely to meet customers so I'd suggest that isn't as much of an issue.

But this isn't about what the company subsidize, of course Nokia would only give it's staff Nokia phones, this extends to their personal buying choices and what they can personally own.
 
We make Lucozade, and can buy it cheap. One of my colleagues posted a photo to the work social network the other day with a can of Red Bull on their desk the other day :confused:.
Personally, I much prefer our stuff and the fact that it's cheap is double win.
 
Last edited:
What's wrong with Farnborough? :(
Nothing, I'm from Farnborough. Too many people on here who are from Farnborough :p

We make Lucozade, and can buy it cheap. One of my colleagues posted a photo to the work social network the other day with a can of Red Bull the other day.
Personally, I much prefer our stuff and the fact that it's cheap is double win.
YOU'RE MY COMPETITOR! :mad:
Well.... Kinda..... :p Cherry lucozade is rank.
 
my old work place if you were wearing trainers and such it was preferable if you wore nike ( as we had 50% discount ) only really when the clients were in the building thought. We all had nokia phones as company phones but pretty much every one had an iphone as well ( Nokia were clients, but the phones were god awful )
 
Just as much as Android can be compared to iOS.

Not so much. I'd buy a chromebook tomorrow if I could easily install a host of applications which do stuff.

The real question is do Nokia make good phones with a good OS? I assume she has an iPhone because "it's cool" but if she can articulate ways in which it actually serves her better, then it's probably better to have such people around to let you know where you're going wrong.
 
But this isn't about what the company subsidize, of course Nokia would only give it's staff Nokia phones, this extends to their personal buying choices and what they can personally own.

Yes. And I'm saying customer facing roles should be using the companies own products.
 
Firstly, people should be free to use the phone that they choose. Secondly, Nokia should use this opportunity to find out why she chose it, what she likes/dislikes as she begins to use it more, and use that information to their advantage.
 
If I was working for Nokia and they actually had a phone that could rival the top Samsung phones then yea OK I wouldn't mind. But they suck so w/e
 
We can use whatever we want at work for personal use, but get issued with the same brand as work phones. I happen to use the same manufacturer's phone for personal use anyway, but plenty of others in all other areas of the business use other manufacturers goods.
 
If I was provided with an up to date mobile that coukd perform a high percentage of what my current handset can do for free, then yes!

Just makes sense. Esoecially if you have to pay nothing for useage.
 
I understand a number of CEO's use competitor products because it can help diversify their ideas

I'm not so sure about this...

I could never imagine the Apple/Microsoft CEO with a competitors product. The damage it could do to a company would be irreversible in todays age (with instant news and the the internet not forgetting anything). However, chief engineers and software developers will have every every thing at their disposal to diversify their ideas. Some one was "iconic" as a CEO wouldn't though (I don't think anyway... happy to be proven wrong though) :p

Edit: To answer the OP. They can't force you to use their own product (unless it is for work purposes in which case they can only enforce it in side the workplace and you are then free to do as you wish outside).
 
Last edited:
There have been a couple of stories about Bill Gates over the years. Apparently a few years ago all his kids really wanted ipads or ipods and he wouldn't get them any, they got zunes instead.
 
Back
Top Bottom