Not fussed by static Ip address (I guess this is useful for VNCing and the like?)Don’t forget with Aquiss as an example, static IPv4, better upload, UK support, IPv6 if you wish, better network. Paying a little more is worth it for some.
Can I ask how some providers can offer 1gb asymmetrical? I thought FTTP was supposed to be like that ?
(e.g. why Sky or Aquiss offering only 100mbit up?)
Yup Aquiss are on point for CS. No foreign call centre BS.Not fussed by static Ip address (I guess this is useful for VNCing and the like?)
UK support does sound good...
But you are right that it will be double the upload speed with FTTP compared to VM cable...
The question is it worth it for the extra money....
That being said I just sent a availability check email to the aquiss team and they responded immediately.....
I also like the look of the speed result from this report.
increasebroadbandspeed.co.uk/fttp-full-fibre-broadband-installation
With VM? Nice!BTW @Cavallino my ping is 5ms to London from the Cotswolds.
Can I ask how some providers can offer 1gb asymmetrical? I thought FTTP was supposed to be like that ?
(e.g. why Sky or Aquiss offering only 100mbit up?)
@Caged has covered it well. Openreach use GPON (which is who Sky, Aquiss, Plusnet, BT etc are using) - whereas the AltNets more often than not, utilising the improved XGS-PON which means offering symmetric speeds a simple choice.
I suspect in the future OR will upgrade to XGS-PON, I think they have already done trials for it. It's an easy upgrade and I believe only requires cabinet/exchange equipment upgrades, rather than customer/cable upgrades as the fibre being laid is capable. It's just the equipment at either end that matters to upgrade to XGS-PON.
No this isn’t correct.
BT could offer far higher upload speeds on FTTP but they choose not to because of contention.
The connection to every PON is 2 Gb down and 1 Gb up. Alt-nets don’t try and claim a consistent speed like BT do hence they can offer symmetrical with no promise of delivery. BT don’t do that.
BT could offer you 1 Gb up and down now but they don’t because they couldn’t guarantee it.
They won’t offer symmetrical even with XGS is available
I didn't say OR can't offer symmetric, but as you mention using GPON means contention becomes a problem so they can't/don't... The pipe can fit 4x more down than it can up with GPON.
GPON allows 10G down and 2.5G up, using XGS-PON allows 10G both down/up - therefore contention isn't a problem as such.
Never with VM.With VM? Nice!
No, no, no. They don't do it because it would eat into their leased line market.BT could offer far higher upload speeds on FTTP but they choose not to because of contention.
No, no, no. They don't do it because it would eat into their leased line market.
You are so far off the mark it’s untrue.That’s clearly an element of it. But not the only or even decisive one.
They don’t offer symmetric because they’d get in trouble for not being able to consistently deliver it.
If you think about it, if they had four customers on 1 Gb they’d use all the bandwidth if they were downloading at the same time