Vote for me!

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:28

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18051869

I'm am right for once in this instance.

We don't a mixed Socket 1156 i7 and i5 overclocking thread do we?

antijoke · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:29

easyrider said:
I'm am right for once in this instance.

We don't a mixed Socket 1156 i7 and i5 overclocking thread do we?

Erm, what?

shauncr91 · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:30

Voted. Dunno why though.

Dark_Angel · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:30

I haven't reading the threads - so um "hi guys, whats going on" :confused:

V4NT0M · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:31

anticonscience said:
Erm, what?

He accidentally a word.

Antar Bolaeisk · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:31

Care to sumarise the events?

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:33

shauncr91 said:
Voted. Dunno why though.

Not for me?

shauncr91 · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:35

easyrider said:
Not for me?

It was for you

Dark_Angel · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:36

easyrider said:
Not for me?

Voted for you because you are on my friends list... plus a sympathy vote because you are losing (by losing I mean being stamped on).

I will read the thread later though, so sod knows if I am right or not in my vote.

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:36

Antar Bolaeisk said:
Care to sumarise the events?

I want a standalone i5 overclocking thread.So all the overclockers on OCUK don't have to sift through results that mean nothing to them saving them a lot of time and effort.

Thats it.

Dark_Angel · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:37

easyrider said:
I want a standalone i5 overclocking thread.So all the overclockers on OCUK don't have to sift through results that mean nothing to them saving them a lot of time and effort.

Thats it.

Ah, in which case I think you are right then.

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:38

Dark_Angel said:
Voted for you because you are on my friends list... plus a sympathy vote because you are losing (by losing I mean being stamped on).

I will read the thread later though, so sod knows if I am right or not in my vote.

People are not using their Vote by the nature of the thread lol.

I was winning when the true enthusist clockers were there at the start of the thread.

people just jumped on the band wagon and voted willy nilly.

geekyEd · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:39

Voted against, when the "i" range is main stream then I think separate is in order but at the moment in the same place is fine.

easyrider said:
I was winning when the true enthusist clockers were there at the start of the thread.

people just jumped on the band wagon and voted willy nilly.

You did post it in GD..... lol

xb8browney · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:40

separate threads

Dark_Angel · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:40

easyrider said:
People are not using their Vote by the nature of the thread lol.

I was winning when the true enthusist clockers were there at the start of the thread.

people just jumped on the band wagon and voted willy nilly.

I can always ask a mod to change my vote?

I do agree though seperate threads for seperate chips types... just my opinion though.

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:41

rjkoneill said:
I will leave that to easyrider

Antar Bolaeisk · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:45

easyrider said:
I want a standalone i5 overclocking thread.So all the overclockers on OCUK don't have to sift through results that mean nothing to them saving them a lot of time and effort.

Thats it.

In that case you are right and deserve my vote.

Dark_Angel · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:47

Go team easy! Vote vote vote! Easyrider will let you use his cinema room if you do

Maccy · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:52

I don't understand this overclocking milarky and I'm a neutral, like Switzerland. Good luck to you though, whatever you're doing!

easyrider · 10 Sep 2009 at 17:52

Dark_Angel said:
Go team easy! Vote vote vote! Easyrider will let you use his cinema room if you do

Vote for me and I will have an OCUK night.

Popcorn,Beer and Movies.

Then PIZZA!