Warhammer 40k (Henry Cavill and Amazon)

Crazy that it took a year just to agree on a deal and we're still years away from it hitting the screen.

GW has obviously gone over everything with a fine tooth comb a thousand times and then some !

They like their IP to be 100% how it is and zero deviance.
 
Crazy that it took a year just to agree on a deal and we're still years away from it hitting the screen.
It's not that uncommon, often scripts and books are optioned for 5-10 years before any firm deal is made, and then it can be another 5-10 before it hits the screen. IIRC Cemeron had the rights to Alita continiously optioned for about 20+ years before it got made into a film, and a lot of authors have noted that their books have been optioned for 5+ years before the option got renewed or dropped.

This deal seems to have hit the "prescript but funding/basic stuff agreed" stage fairly quickly given the scale of the IP.
 
Last edited:
Unless they've spent a year arguing for creative control.

That's pretty much exactly what they've been doing - agreeing the 'creative guidelines' before proceeding with anything else.

2023 Press Release:

Further to its announcement on 16 December 2022, Games Workshop is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement with Amazon Content Services LLC, a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc., ("Amazon") for the prospective development by Amazon of Games Workshop's Warhammer 40,000 universe into films and television series, together with associated merchandising rights.

Under the terms of the agreement, Games Workshop has granted exclusive rights to Amazon in relation to films and television series set within the Warhammer 40,000 universe, together with an option for Amazon to license equivalent rights in the Warhammer Fantasy universe following the release of the initial Warhammer 40,000 production.

Games Workshop and Amazon will work together for a period of 12 months to agree creative guidelines for the films and television series to be developed by Amazon. The agreement will only proceed once the creative guidelines are mutually agreed between Games Workshop and Amazon.

A further announcement will be made in due course.

The Company makes no change to its forecast for the 53 week period ending 2 June 2024.

2024 Press Release:

Further to its announcement on 18 December 2023, Games Workshop is pleased to announce that it has now agreed creative guidelines and reached a final agreement with Amazon Content Services LLC, a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc., ("Amazon") for the adaption of Games Workshop's Warhammer 40,000 universe into films and television series, together with associated merchandising rights.

Under the terms of the agreement, Games Workshop has granted exclusive rights to Amazon in relation to films and television series set within the Warhammer 40,000 universe, together with an option for Amazon to license equivalent rights in the Warhammer Fantasy universe following the release of any initial Warhammer 40,000 production.

Production processes in respect of films and television series may take a number of years.

The Company makes no change to its forecast for the 52 week period ending 1 June 2025.
 
Their IP has changed a lot since they first started, it's never been a fixed thing
Yup

A lot of the early lore was very much jokes and references to other things (most of the early character models for example were parodies of things like Zulu for the battle at Orcs drift, Arnie, Mad Donna etc), they've expanded on it a lot and tried to make it a little more coherent/defendable as trademarks, and they've always had it canon that in 40k for example there are contradictions due to damaged records, different versions of the same records, time, distance etc and it's mentioned a few times that there have been schisms/mini civil wars in the imperial burocracy about all sorts of things (not to mention the inquisition etc deliberately attempting to hide stuff), and that even the date has been in dispute and caused minor (as in only a few planetary systems at a time getting involved in fighting) disputes ;)

It's one of the reasons I had to laugh at the fuss over custodes, when people were saying "they've always been men" when AFAIK the only actual lore about their gender was about a line from the perspective of outsiders who'd only ever seen them in their armour, and made assumptions*, and the only undisputed lore about who/what they are was that they were individually created to a higher standard than the Space Marines and hunt chaos marines in a labyrinth for fun and training. So absolutely zero reason for them to be men only, as Space Marines rely on the geneseed from their founders/primarchs and the potential candidates have to be matched to that as opposed the to modifications being tailored to the candidate as happens with custards.

*As it was IIRC from the perspective of a high ranking imperial noble watching a couple of custodes in a parade or something, with the great sons of the hive world's army or something.
 
Last edited:
Forgive me werewolf, but it's so weird that you would bring that up knowing that it's a controversial topic, and then dedicate two whole paragraphs to it. Nonetheless I shall respond as it's obviously something you're looking for. My take is that the custodes should not be looked at as male or female. They should barely be looked at as human as they've had anything that made them human superceded by their geneseed in the same way the adeptus mechanicus can barely be described as human at this point. The entire point of 40k is exactly what it says on the tin: "In the grim darkness of the 41st millenium, there is only war" - a finite war against the warp that the imperium is losing on a daily basis; for the custodes the subject of gender is as moot as the concept of what they had for dinner last night.

I understand that my fellow geeks are canon fixated (which let's be honest, is the core problem). Lore expands. Things change and I often wish that aside from the occasional hero characters games workshop would just keep the helmet on so that the people paying the bills (i.e. the customers) could have some agency in their armies and build their own legends. For me the bad guys here are games workshop for feeding into culture wars nonsense in the first place.

Edit: I will say that if they absolutely insist on rocking the boat and they don't pick a female actress that's positiveiy amazonian, I'm going to be exceedingly disappointed - and I am in favour of any such cast member being a member of the Adepta Sororitas more than changing the core chapters in any fundamental way on screen.
 
Last edited:
Forgive me werewolf, but it's so weird that you would bring that up knowing that it's a controversial topic, and then dedicate two whole paragraphs to it. Nonetheless I shall respond as it's obviously something you're looking for. My take is that the custodes should not be looked at as male or female. They should barely be looked at as human as they've had anything that made them human superceded by their geneseed in the same way the adeptus mechanicus can barely be described as human at this point. The entire point of 40k is exactly what it says on the tin: "In the grim darkness of the 41st millenium, there is only war" - a finite war against the warp that the imperium is losing on a daily basis; for the custodes the subject of gender is as moot as the concept of what they had for dinner last night.

I understand that my fellow geeks are canon fixated (which let's be honest, is the core problem). Lore expands. Things change and I often wish that aside from the occasional hero characters games workshop would just keep the helmet on so that the people paying the bills (i.e. the customers) could have some agency in their armies and build their own legends. For me the bad guys here are games workshop for feeding into culture wars nonsense in the first place.

Edit: I will say that if they absolutely insist on rocking the boat and they don't pick a female actress that's positiveiy amazonian, I'm going to be exceedingly disappointed - and I am in favour of any such cast member being a member of the Adepta Sororitas more than changing the core chapters in any fundamental way on screen.
They (Warhammer) already did the female custodies retcon in Tithes on Warhammer+.
 
Forgive me werewolf, but it's so weird that you would bring that up knowing that it's a controversial topic, and then dedicate two whole paragraphs to it. Nonetheless I shall respond as it's obviously something you're looking for. My take is that the custodes should not be looked at as male or female. They should barely be looked at as human as they've had anything that made them human superceded by their geneseed in the same way the adeptus mechanicus can barely be described as human at this point. The entire point of 40k is exactly what it says on the tin: "In the grim darkness of the 41st millenium, there is only war" - a finite war against the warp that the imperium is losing on a daily basis; for the custodes the subject of gender is as moot as the concept of what they had for dinner last night.

To be honest no person I have spoken to about this has a problem with female custodes, the problem came from some woke idiot at GW HQ stating "they have always existed" and "you are the problem" type followups.

There were infinately better ways to introduce them, sisters of silence getting leveled up, something that Cawl managed to cook up from his time working on Primaris Marines, or *insert something from one of the most expansive lore IP's going*.
 
They (Warhammer) already did the female custodies retcon in Tithes on Warhammer+.
I just caught up with with all the Warhammer + content at the weekend.

If that’s the way Female Custodies are going to be then why do it. It was just a lady dude that acted and looked like a man. The Sister of Silence was awesome.

Men and women are different if they ain’t going to display that in the writing or on the screen then what’s the point.
 
Last edited:
I just caught up with with all the Warhammer + content at the weekend.

If that’s the way Female Custodies are going to be then why do it. It was just a lady dude that acted and looked like a man. The Sister of Silence was awesome.

Men and women are different if they ain’t going to display that in the writing or on the screen then what’s the point.

you can't tell people that. It's easier to point the finger and call someone prejudiced than admit that the problem is that fanbases generally like narrative to make sense, and you don't get that kind of storytelling from someone with poor literacy skills.
 
I just caught up with with all the Warhammer + content at the weekend.

If that’s the way Female Custodies are going to be then why do it. It was just a lady dude that acted and looked like a man. The Sister of Silence was awesome.

Men and women are different if they ain’t going to display that in the writing or on the screen then what’s the point.

I mean custodes are not really human, and are absolutely nothing like a marine either.

Female custodes are fine, I like it.
 
I mean custodes are not really human, and are absolutely nothing like a marine either.

Female custodes are fine, I like it.

I think that was kind of my point - Custodes may in theory look like men, but anything that made them biologically human men was eradicated long ago when they began their transformation.
 
I think that was kind of my point - Custodes may in theory look like men, but anything that made them biologically human men was eradicated long ago when they began their transformation.

Sorry kind of misunderstood you originally but yes.

If anything they should be genderless I guess
 
Back
Top Bottom