Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
You don't watch Manchester United very often do you?
Yes i do, most weeks I watch as much football as is humanly possible, I also watch it live i don't watch the highlights which frankly can make anyone look good.
I also don't rate someone as having had an effective game because they were on the ball a lot, or they really really tried hard, or he tracked back so well, or he never stopped running and could really see his passion and need to work hard. He's a striker, he has a good game in my eyes when he does well as a striker. Some people seem overly swayed by simply how many touches someone has of the ball, rather than how much time they are completely out of position leaving other players with no one to pass to.
If he wants to be on the ball all the time and be the playmaker thats fine, however he should be playing for instance, instead of Scholes, not playing in the area of the pitch Scholes would normally dominate. As I said if he did what he does now, with ANOTHER striker up there infront of him for his work to pay off and plays as that attacking midfielder fine.
Look at it this way, when Adebayor gets a hatrick against a woeful defence then for 5 games trys to be Henry, dropping deep to get the ball and going out on the wing I cringe, why? because he leaves no one for Fabregas to pass to and simply gets in his way. You need a striker and a attacking midfielder, he is not as good a striker, or as good a midfielder as he could be if he stuck to ONE of those roles.
I also didn't say Rooney was particularly inconsistant, however he DOES have games where he's not even noticeable except for the frustrated bad tackles, theres already been a few(including england) this year, Ronaldo has them aswell, but Ronaldo's consistant goal scoring really speaks for itself.