If anything Eboues pass was a little under weighted imo and only just got to Diaby in time, i can't remember who was tracking back but if they had a little more faith they would have intercepted it - only someone as **** as Eboue could almost **** that easy pass up.
Diaby is more than ok going forward, talent wise he is right up there with our best ....+ he has never had in uninterrupted season with his many niggling injuries. What does he offer??? You mean apart from the fact that he can go past defenders like they're standing still and has a great eye for goal .......Song/Denilson can only dream of having Diaby's skill.
You're truly the most awful Arsenal supporter, words can't describe your drivel.
Yet another complete post of crap ignoring everything I said to make up his own idea's of what I said.
I said what does he offer defensively the first time, and he's no where near Arshavin, Fabregas, Rosicky, Nasri, RVP, Eduardo's level, so other than as back up to our backup, where does he fit in going fowards. He was played as our second holding midfielder yesterday but never helped in any way defensively while Fabregas was playing deeper than he really needs to for yet another game, he's great at it simply because he's a great footballer, but he's our best player and should be working in his best role.
Considering for Diaby to get forward as much as he did, Fabregas had to stay back more than he should, thats a trade off that well, worked against Pompie, and Fenebache, and not really any single time inbetween.
He can't go past defenders like they are standing still, he can go past Mullins like he's not even a footballer, which, lets be honest, he's not anymore.
How often does Diaby play like that, once in a rare while, coinciding with playing woefully poor teams. Woo, he's an ok player offensively, I'll again point out for YEARS that I've been saying he could make a great attacking player, but offers nothing defensively while much of the world and this forum, have said he's going to be the answer to our holding midfield problems. WHen I've said, for years, that he worked on the wing because he's a great dribbler I was laughed out of thread after thread.
Yet now, misqouting and misrepresenting what I said you've decided to throw back what I've been saying for the best part of 3 years in my face like you just came up with it.
Do one.
As I've said, he's played as a DM, he's damn awful at it, he's an ok offensive player, no more than ok, his strength is running with the ball, something no one on these boards agreed with 2 years ago when I said it, but we have better players in every offensive position, infact we pretty much have 2 better players in all offensive positions.
SO tell me, is Diaby SO good we should play Fab as a DM so Diaby can play the forward role? Really? Or do you think he's an ok player who did ok against a terrible side and shouldn't start when our full first team is trying to win big games.
