Ronaldo benched, wouldn't have that lad. go on strike, we'll take you back.
Chelsea's defence stopped dead Arsenal's strikers, yes. See above. There's nothing special in what Chelsea did.
Chelsea did not have the better over Arsenal's midfield despite what you think. Arsenal's midfield held possession and had Chelsea on the back-foot for the majority of the second half. Why do Chelsea feel the need to 'concede possession' when they're 2-0 up? Most teams will be charging for the third straight away.
Well to be fair, its how most teams play, the only thing that varies is the amount of goals up they go, or time they alow to go by, before they do it.
Chelsea are strong enough to not need to go chasing a third against most teams.
United do it a lot, especially If they go up against the better sides.
Its something Arsenal have never learned to do under Wenger, its always been a case of surging forward and scoring more than the other team.
Great when you have an excellent team of 6ft plus world class players, not great when you have a team of diminutive lightweights who treat every match like a two touch training session.
He's often said before that he refuses to buy or even go for certain players for fear of "destroying e.g. Denilson or Diaby". Funny really. Since sticking with those very players is itself ironically bringing the results down.
Messi is far too good to be human
Would have agreed in the past but I think the midfield were good today for Arsenal and the problem was up front
I didn't think Messi was anywhere near his best from the bits I saw. Just shows how good he is though when you think he can be better than that.