That is why I'm assuming it isn't the same one as this was in Yeovil South Somerset but it was weird seeing what looked like the exact same car (I don't think I'd even seen one let alone in that colour before this thread). Unfortunately not going that way until Friday again.
Well, this was always on the cards....
- Thread starter Scania
- Start date
That is why I'm assuming it isn't the same one as this was in Yeovil South Somerset but it was weird seeing what looked like the exact same car (I don't think I'd even seen one let alone in that colour before this thread). Unfortunately not going that way until Friday again.
Caporegime
Just seen this, and done. Also, you know we have a PM system now
I can't be trusted with such things. I have a camera and a penis and we all know how that ends.
Feel free to chop out the naughty bits tooif you like, I haven't had time tonight. If not I'll do it tomorrow
Cheers!
Cheers mate.Just seen this, and done. Also, you know we have a PM system now
He certainly knows how to make himself appealing as a seller!
Wow!
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 10,646
I followed a nice 735i to work the other day, good plate on it.
E38 VB made to look like V8 obviously
Edit : turns out it was E3 BVB
E38 VB made to look like V8 obviously
Edit : turns out it was E3 BVB
It’s reappeared on eBay with photoshop images (KGF got their images pulled I assume) now described as perfect in the title but then “only a few flaws” in the description, it’s still listed as one owner (!) - the V5 will show 4 now.
17 years old (it’s 19), mentions the broken spring but not the blown self levelling shock absorber (the expensive bit) nor bottom arm....
At least he’s now noting it’s got no MOT.
I’m finding it quite amusing watching this tbh, and I’m very glad it’s his problem now, not mine....
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/372622879678
17 years old (it’s 19), mentions the broken spring but not the blown self levelling shock absorber (the expensive bit) nor bottom arm....
At least he’s now noting it’s got no MOT.
I’m finding it quite amusing watching this tbh, and I’m very glad it’s his problem now, not mine....
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/372622879678
Yes I know, I’m puzzled as to why he isn’t more up front about what work it needs - wants to maximise his return I guess - I just can’t see him getting anywhere near that figure given there’s plenty on Autotrader for example with full MOT and no faults - albeit with more miles - for less, which is why I priced it the way I did when I sold it (and thought I actually did well to get what I did for it).
Soldato
Nah, he's worded it cleverly (I'm being kind...), he's saying that the one of the owners had it for 17 years in the main description and the default 'info' description states the actual number of owners. He's not actually saying it's a 1 owner car and 17 years old, but I'm sure many will read it that way.
Yeah, I see what you mean, you’d think somebody after something like that would be particular about it especially given the asking price and it’s issues, then again, nothing stranger than folk and I guess that’s what he’s banking on.
Doubtful - He rocked up to buy it i an f01 730d that had no MOT (I checked it for some reason!)
I’m assuming he doesn’t believe in them!
