Soldato
Never been hit with randomware or ransomware alike, which is why I don't use signature based AV.
I've never been struck by lightning since using Windows Defender so I'm going to keep doing that
Never been hit with randomware or ransomware alike, which is why I don't use signature based AV.
I've never seen a home user on a modern OS hit. And frankly yes, if you don't take any sort of backups of your important data then that is just silly. What Im saying is having access to the very best AI based solutions which ive seen fail doesn't replace fully a traditional signature based solution. AI solutions are great but don't always work.
I agree with having backups, everyone needs them and not just for protecting against malicious objects as hardware does fail.
But they don't need to roll over and take it, there are other options than using signature based AV.
So when hit with 0-day, just restore from backup and carry on? what about the normal home user, just pay up then?
Never been hit with randomware or ransomware alike, which is why I don't use signature based AV.
I said before prevention is far easier than cure for businesses or home users.
been using norton for donkeys years with no viruses on any of our devices. it's such a small amount to pay (£15) for a year/10 devices.
Iv noticed with defender you can download the eicar virus test file and extract it too but using something like nod32 it blocks the download straight away and flags it up.
Going onto the anti virus test sites that load up weblinks with virus tests defender doesnt catch anything abd loads the web pages up as normal where again nod32 content filters the browser and stops the site loading up.
Makes me wonder if defender really is up to the task.
Anyone else experiencing this with defender?
what more does it do over defender?
Isnt that banned for use in us and europe?I use Kaspersky, .
I don't use any Antivirus,
Nope, I don't work for the US government so it doesn't concern me. There was some media hysteria a while ago about it being spyware, so far there has been absolutely zero evidence of that. I believe some NSA worker made a mistake by agreeing to voluntarily upload suspicious files to Kaspersky for analysis, and he sent some NSA hacking tool that wasn't supposed to be shared. That is generally a good thing to give users that option because it allows them to identify and protect against new threats quicker.Isnt that banned for use in us and europe?