Isn't that The Mirror?
What is the daily mail reader stereotype?
- Thread starter MaxP779
- Start date
Isn't that The Mirror?
I thought it was the Express.
Yup, the Express are always coming out with Diana stories.
Of course there is. It's full of racist nonsense and is in no way the broadsheet it pretends to be.
As I said in good humour, but disdainful all the same only like a cheeky grandson can be - or get away with. It comes with the territory of the family, we're all quite political in one way or another. Apart from gran the floating voter, who is under Tory misrule starting to warm to independence. A few years ago it was a pretty strong no. Granny is starting to see the light by her own accord!
Lied to on a daily basis. Labour aren't in meltdown, it's all just rays of sunshine and rainbows in John Smith House..
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Just read the local paper. That way, you can't be judged for buying the wrong one.
If you're a builder.. Ignore this and buy the daily star. They have boobies.
If you're a builder.. Ignore this and buy the daily star. They have boobies.
If you don't buy newspapers or analyse the news daily any more how do you know the Daily Mail is full of racist nonsense?
Is it just from other people's opinions?
From reading them. Just because I no longer buy them does not mean I do not have access to them. I use them regularly in my duties, and can also find them recreationally at work. There's also been a significant amount of the articles posted here, racially charged also.
Sufficient enough for your inquisitiveness ?
I read opinion and news, thus I analyse, however I don't do it politically any longer. For my own consumption only. I do have a habit of collecting papers on important events, that started with 9/11. Most others are political, except for London/Glasgow bombings etc. Got a small box now.
Last edited:
Oh I see, you're a reader & analyser of the Daily Mail then.
Unless you sit and chew at it.... yes?
Not avidly yet often enough to see the clear and obvious undercurrents and overtones, but often enough over the last 10-15 years to come to my conclusions.? Yes.
I find the political statements to be more extreme in the columns, and the racial issues to be by cherrypicking examples through articles. Often long articles about foreigners in some sense. Very touchy paper when it comes to immigration, health, and Johnny Foreigner. Also quite wide spectrum too, it isn't all that by any means. But it is, and rightly so, tarred with a brush as a whole because it is confortable in spraying its bias so obviously.
I'm not the only one to have noticed, and dismisssed it for as such, it is a paper that regards me as a rotten sporran dangler after all, but alas if you read it and I've upset you I'd get over it to be honest. It's just someone else with a different opinion at the end of the day.
Live and let live, as you so rightly quoted.
Last edited:
No, not on the aforementioned issues. All papers have their bias, some are better than others. The DM is not very good in my opinion.
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 205
- Location
- Wales
You do realise that general discussion reads like the DailyMail...
.
I find it mildly comical that anyone feels the need to pigeon hole anyone based on the newspaper they happen to buy. I've been known to buy the Sun in the past for the football. Doesn't make me an axe murderer, moron or polically alligned one way or the other.
I just wanted to read about the football.
I just wanted to read about the football.