Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 7,321
- Location
- Western Seaboard
Drugs!
Agreed, and OP is now in fits of laughter as our brains are fried from his conundrum

Drugs!
Not at all, that's just being numb with units of measurement.
It should be - what is twice as cold as 32f?
Well as 68f is room temperature (comfort) twice as cold should be -4f
But the question is asking about differences in quantities which are dependant on scale.
In one of those 4am thoughts a few years ago, I remember thinking how darkness and cold don't exist, they're just lower values of light and warmth.
but there is a definite end to the scale, it's like asking what's half the height of a 10m tower, the answer can be in feet meters etc it's the same.
0 C is not 0 in terms of temperature it's actually + 273 C
you can get warmth from 0c therefore it is not 'cold'
So what is twice as cold as 0°C?
[/QUOTE]
Because you were feeling cold. :p
im having twice as lamb for dinner, just about to put it in the oven at 453.15 K
0 C is not 0 in terms of temperature it's actually + 273 C
Only if you've been turned into a cherry flavoured popsicle by some unfortunate industrial accident. Warm and cold are relative to the measure.
0 is just a point on a scale, nothing more. Why are you assigning the meaning of absolute zero to it?
,"Cold" is confusing in the same way that "short" or "small" is
confusing. If I say that I am twice as short as you, what I probably
mean is that I am half as tall as you. It isn't really a good way to
talk at all; it's best to say "half as tall" because it's less
confusing.
"Cold" is even more confusing than "short" because temperatures can be
negative, but height can never be negative (not the height of a
person, anyway). If "twice as cold" means "half the temperature"
'cold' is absolute zero