One of the most frustrating things about the 'BLM' movement is how little scrutiny the core claims of either the movement or the organisation are subjected to in wider circles.
In short you either have to be wilfully ignorant (maybe the sort of person to use a racially pejorative insult whilst trying to make a point for supposedly "anti racist" organisation?) of clearly accessible facts or have malicious motives to support either the BLM movement or organisation.
The malicious motive is the usual one that such "activist" movements have which is agitation for the repeatedly failed ideology of socialism by trying to usher in social unrest.
One simply phrased question destroys the whole premise of so called "white privilege" ..... namely if "white privilege" is a thing that explains most or all of the disparities we see why do certain non white groups consistently outperform whites in white majority countries like the UK and USA?
BLM can mean one of two things both of which make no sense to support.
One is a violent, nasty, anti semitic, Marxist organisation that, amongst other things, wants to do away with the traditional family unit and get rid of the police.
The other is a vague sentiment following the meaning of the words in the slogan....
.... with the suggestion being that society as a whole doesn't care for black lives or cares for them less than other ethnicities.
This is demonstrable nonsense.
The single biggest cause of a violent untimely death for a black persons at the hands of another in the UK and the US is being killed by another black person.
It's true that most whites murdered are murdered by other whites but the rates for blacks killing blacks, on a per capita basis are massively higher than the rates for whites killing whites.
Interracially, on a per capita basis, blacks kill whites at around twelve times the rate as the other way around in the US.
As of July of 2016 African Americans were the largest racial minority, amounting to an estimated 12.7%
In the same year the FBI figures for homicides nationwide shows that, where the race of the offender was known, this was the break down for homicides involving blacks and whites as either victims or perpetrators.
White victim total = 3,499
Pepetrator White = 2,854
Perpetrator Black = 533
Black or African American victim total = 2,870
Perpetrator White =243
Pepetrator Black = 2,570
So what can we glean from these figures?
For whites just over 81.5% of murders were committed by other whites
and just over 15. 2‰ were committed by blacks
For Black's the figures were just over 8.46%
murded by whites
and over 89.5‰ for deaths at the hands of other blacks.
And let's look at the absolute figures..
Black's killed 533 whites when they made up 12.7‰ of the population
And whites killed 243 blacks when they made up 76.9‰ of the population
So not only did whites kill less blacks then the other way around in overall numbers they did so whilst having over six times as many people in the country!
So you could express the racial disparity in interracial homicides in the USA, on a per capita basis, between blacks and whites as being in the region of over a factor of twelve in favour of the blacks much more frequently being the perpetrators in interacial murders between the two groups (just over six times as many whites as blacks in total and in absolute figures blacks kill over twice as many whites as vice versa)
The police kill, arrest and stop a disproportionate amount of blacks based on their percentage of the population but these disparities are caused primarily by the disproportionate violent crime rates for blacks as reported by witnesses to crimes.
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Bureau of Justice Statistics
Criminal Victimization, 2017
TABLE 10
Nonfatal violent incidents, by total population, victim, and offender demographic characteristics, 2017
In about three-quarters (76%) of violent incidents where perceived offender characteristics were reported the victim perceived the offender to be male.
Based on victims’ reports, there were about four-fifths as many white offenders as the percentage of whites in the population, about twice as many black offenders as the percentage of blacks in the population, and about one-sixth as many Asian offenders as the percentage.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdf
In the US whites arrested for violent crimes are significantly more likely to be killed by the police than blacks arrested for violent crimes.
The claim is often then made that blacks commit more crime either because they are poor or because of some legacy of suffering from slavery and segregation.
Neither of these make any sense when examined more closely.
There are nearly three times as many whites living in poverty in the US than blacks as an absolute number (the percentage for blacks as group is about double that of whites but there are far fewer blacks overall than whites).
From 2018 figures there were around 25, 295,122 White Americans living in poverty (as defined by the federal governments poverty threshold)
vs 9,148691 blacks living in poverty
https://www.povertyusa.org/facts
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/IPE120218
So if poverty was the main issue then the poor whites should be massively inflating the rate of overall violent crimes for whites vs the smaller number of blacks living in poverty on the US.
If a legacy of oppression was the cause of crime then we could expect one of the most consistently oppressed groups in all of history (the Jews) to top the per capita rates for violent crime but we don't see this.
Instead we see them and other minority groups who often entered the US poor like Koreans and Indians not only surpassing blacks in many metrics (including not being arrested or incarcerated) but also significantly beating the white majority in many cases.
The conclusion should be obvious.
Culture matters and not all cultures are equal.
Whites don't underperform Koreans in many metrics in the US due to racism, systemic or otherwise, they do so because large parts of white culture in the US are inferior to large parts of the culture adopted by Koreans living in the US when it comes to things like economic success and avoiding incarceration.
The same applies to other racial groups when compared to one another.
You can also look at the significant disparities within 'blacks' as a group.
Whites are one of the least likely of all racial groups to goto university in the UK.
Afro Caribbeans attend a rate close to whites but black Africans attend at a much higher rate than either whites or Afro Caribbeans.
Again the answer is in culture not racism.
An increasing amount of people are done taking uncritical lectures by the likes of BLM supporters, their sycophants and the degenerate Marxists taking advantage of the chaos they cause about things like supposed white privilege because their claims are all based on lies.
If you want to see a truly disgraceful example of massive unjust disproportionality consider that, based on fairy recent figures, that the ratio of interracial crime rate for violent offences in the US between Blacks and Asians was so bad that Black on Asian violent crime was around 280 times more common than the reverse
(it should have course be mentioned that whites are massively overrepresented on a per capita basis in crimes against Asians than the reverse, just significantly less than Blacks )
Are you capable of structuring a paragraph or do you get a perverted kick out of inflicting this godawful posting structure on us all?
