It is ridiculous isn't it. Could it stem from the American guilt-ridden affirmative action malarkey way back when - forward to today where Western media is noticeably US centric in terms of influence... perhaps how it seeped into modern western society and focused more on the obvious visual difference?
That's been my theory and in the recent speech by Kemi Badenoch regarding white privilege she raised exactly that point.
Basically that much of our anti-racism groups and policies (including black history month) seem to have been imported directly from the US. Even though much of it has very little equivalence in UK culture. I actually feel the implementation of US designed policies/history/theories damaging for the structure and stability of the UK society where things are very different as is British history.
For example saying "Black History is American history" is a perfectly valid statement in the context of the , relatively short, history of the USA as a country. Given the impact the slavery trade clearly had on the USA as a nation.
The phrase I've seen used frequently by some groups "Black history is English/British/Welsh" history is largely a meaningless one wholesale borrowed from USA literature. It'd be like saying that "White history is Japanese history" or "Asian history is Norwegian history"! It's nonsensical!
The history of people derives from their ethnicity/culture/nationalities/etc.
I honestly think it's unhealthy and counter productive the way we're attributing so many policies and attributes purely to a person's skin colour. We need to start focusing on what people do, how they act and start ignoring the colour of their skin.
That's the only way we can put an end to racism. Using the phrase "White Privilege" is in itself part of the problem. It only serves to divide us further.
I'm aware I'll be called a racist for being negative about Black History Month. Whilst I can see the benefit and relevance of it in the USA I just feel the adoption of it as a concept elsewhere doesn't have context and is counterproductive if preventing racism is the goal.
I think the fear of being seen as racist is what's resulted in this well intentioned if ultimately misguided policy. Someone in a board meeting for a company/council/etc suggests celebrating black history month and for fear of being seen as racist everyone just quietly goes along with it!
Hence you end up with councils making glib statements like "Scotland's History is Black History". Or monopolistic supermarkets looking to appear virtuous suddenly rushing to support Marxist anti-capitalist BLM movements!