What to do with undesirables

Tombstone said:
Although her lawyer has denied that she has Bangladeshi nationality and they've decided to pursue legal measures. So I'm guessing this may drag out a little yet.
Click to expand...

As long as she stays in her chosen backwards hole while that happens thats fine.

Hopefully she ventures out and is accidently hit by a stray missile
 
I don't believe the British have the sympathy she thinks she deserves.

Karma perhaps, it's about time we took a harder line with this Islamist threat, isn't it funny that it's a Muslim that's leading the way! It's almost as if previous home secretaries where scared to speak out.
 
-UnderClocker- said:
What kind of lawyer do you have to be to defend a terrorist?

Wrong answers only :D
Click to expand...

A) one that knows defending terrorists means a bumper pay day from the human rights groups and Saudi funded groups.

B) publicity hungry ones who crave fame, notoriety and a CV that means all the world's scumbags seek them out so they always have work.

C) narcacists who love winning in the face of the odds despite how it makes them look.
 
Last edited:
SexyGreyFox said:
E) Everybody deserves the right to a defense
Click to expand...

Ebay_D-FENS_Car_3_55d23850-5c49-4e53-ac77-44fdb730c098.jpg
 
Only in current "it's cool to be Liberal" Britain could so much verbose bull be written in the legal and moral defence of an enemy of the State. I look at Mossad with unabashed envy in such circumstances. They deal with such people with quiet cunning and abject ruthlessness. Even Putin deals with enemies of the State with Draconian effect, albeit with a high element of theatre. The cost of deploying Special Forces to rid us of this woman and her "school pals" would have been money well spent. Has her family been brought to the media's scrutiny? I find it incredible to think girls who do something so calculated and needing such planning are not the produce of families with a generally anti western agenda. But still, we need these foreign doctors and engineers, I am told....
 
Chris Wilson said:
Only in current "it's cool to be Liberal" Britain could so much verbose bull be written in the legal and moral defence of an enemy of the State. I look at Mossad with unabashed envy in such circumstances. They deal with such people with quiet cunning and abject ruthlessness. Even Putin deals with enemies of the State with Draconian effect, albeit with a high element of theatre. The cost of deploying Special Forces to rid us of this woman and her "school pals" would have been money well spent. Has her family been brought to the media's scrutiny? I find it incredible to think girls who do something so calculated and needing such planning are not the produce of families with a generally anti western agenda. But still, we need these foreign doctors and engineers, I am told....
Click to expand...

Stop being naive, always going on about lack of common sense, yet forgetting that there’s still plenty of ambiguity in this case for someone to argue about in court.

Indeed it’s not even about whether you like or don’t like the person/traitor/idiot, there are some in here who want a brutal murder of an innocent child, that simply is not ******* on and frankly just as anti-British as any jihadi.
 
StriderX said:
Stop being naive, always going on about lack of common sense, yet forgetting that there’s still plenty of ambiguity in this case for someone to argue about in court.

Indeed it’s not even about whether you like or don’t like the person/traitor/idiot, there are some in here who want a brutal murder of an innocent child, that simply is not ******* on and frankly just as anti-British as any jihadi.
Click to expand...


I don't believe I have mentioned common sense at all. Good old "nouce" as we call it up north. I do think that an enemy we are supposedly at war with should be treated as the enemy and dealt with as such. We are supposed to be having a war against these terrorists not being their social workers.
 
Chris Wilson said:
I don't believe I have mentioned common sense at all. Good old "nouce" as we call it up north. I do think that an enemy we are supposedly at war with should be treated as the enemy and dealt with as such. We are supposed to be having a war against these terrorists not being their social workers.
Click to expand...

We’re on the same side, I’m simply of the opinion that this is not over by any margin. I wouldn’t call victory yet.
 
I'll agree there, I am sure like many losers there will be many who will pretend to change their spots in order to have their cake and eat it. But we should endeavour to make it hugely unpalatable for them to live in a country where they detest their fellow citizens to the extent they are willing to join those at war against us and our way of life. It will be legally interesting to see how far the government will go to stand their ground, and whether they can perhaps change the law if necessary.
 
Well I've got to agree with Shamima Begum on the News this evening when she asked why is she being treated differently to the hundreds who have already returned.
"Is it because I was on the News four years ago?".
She has a point.
 
It is a bit hilarious that she is expecting that the home secretary come and interview her or speak to her before having taken the decision of revoking her citizenship.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom