That is such an odd video to me. You are told that the level of craftsmanship is going to increase - it’s zooms into the detail and it’s interesting, but then the narrator seems to switch into fluff mode sometime when looking at the second watch. “Look at this - it’s better because of some swirly lines that you aren’t even able to see, so it justifies the price”. He made no mention of the actually machinery keeping the watch going. I was expecting him to say the machinery was going to get more complicated but he only really talked about the finishing on the internal parts. He then started going on about things finished by hand being superior than by machine - at this point my bull sensor started going off. I suspect you could design modern complex machinery to do the job - but why would you when it would ruin the mystique of the time it takes to finish these components by hand.
The craftsmanship is impressive, you can’t say otherwise, but in the absence of an explanation as to how it affects the mechanics, it’s all a bit redundant surely? If you like what it looks like and you like the brand then go for it, but more intricate finishing that affects the aesthetics of, predominantly, the inside of a watch, is surely a terrible reason to justify getting one!
Perhaps there were mechanical differences that he could have mentioned but didn’t.