Oi back in your shell you let the man try linux if he wants to you swine!Well they haven't announced anything yet, hold off until they do.
Oi back in your shell you let the man try linux if he wants to you swine!
If they do this
I red "they can try it if they want too" in the voice of that song "it's my party, and I'll cry if I want to" hahahaThey can try it if they want too. Will wait for the threads on "How do I do this in linux".
The problem is often with the anti cheat systems rather than the game itself.Until Linux gamer supports better then moving from Windows will be a hard sell for many. Steam OS is a start but many AAA titles don't work on there.
I think it will be a monthly subscription. That's how their enterprise licences works now. I would just hang on to Windows 10 or 11 as long as I can and then move back to Linux full time when that was no longer tenable. I find Windows more convenient for gaming but Proton/Steam have come a long way now and I'm no longer a hardcore gamer.
You say that and I'm not disagreeing but they do have plans to allow normal users access to their ESU program, for a fee...They never going to do that with end users no way IMO.
You say that and I'm not disagreeing but they do have plans to allow normal users access to their ESU program, for a fee...
For most people there isn't an alternative. Yes there is MacOS but that involves not only buying expensive hardware but also getting used to a new way of working. Most people don't know about Linux, FreeBSD, ReactOS, Haiku, etc, and even fewer would be willing to try them. Chrome OS is a viable alternative for many people though. Perhaps they could move there. But if presented with a small fee such as £20 a year or £2 a month then they would just pay the fee. Realistically I'm not sure why we expect Windows to be free nowadays. Microsoft used to sell a stand alone copy of Office but it moved to a subscription model years ago.They never going to do that with end users no way IMO.
If they do people will move away to alternitives. Moving to an OS subscription model for consumers is sucicide.
I can understand services like 0365 being subscription but not the OS.
Deploying an OS in the cloud has nothing to do with the EOL and ESU support.You can do that now if you want. You can deploy an OS in the cloud for a subscription cost.
ESU is only for three years so no, not on-going.As for the updates in 2025 for windows 10, yes there will be an on-going subscription for these users.
So far MS seem to have no plans to stop selling non-subscription versions of Office, the last one was Office 2021 and then next it planned for 2024.Microsoft used to sell a stand alone copy of Office but it moved to a subscription model years ago.
Deploying an OS in the cloud has nothing to do with the EOL and ESU support.
An OS in the cloud has the same EOL as a locally installed OS.
ESU is only for three years so no, not on-going.
So far MS seem to have no plans to stop selling non-subscription versions of Office, the last one was Office 2021 and then next it planned for 2024.
Kind of seems strange to mention that in a reply to ESU being offered to normal consumers, but OK.I’m not on about that I’m on about the OS subscription model.
There's no may about it, they are. Did you not read the post you were replying to or the link?They may charge for EOL updates, which is fine they do t have to continue with updates at all if they retire an OS to EOL.