What's wrong with the railways in this country?

I always smile when people on Facebook moan about the C2C service to Fenchurch street. One of the best train operators in the country IMO. Unless you get one on one of the last stops before London you can get a seat, very rarely is the service delayed by more than a minute and when it is, it's usually something outside their control (cars crashing into bridges seemed to be popular?)

Somebody could run the most flawless service on the planet for just 50p a day and people would STILL moan. Peoples expectations are generally unreasonable (But not always).
 
The London to Swansea uses 30 year old trains and spend no money on them. Due to constantly being late, they just alter the timetable so my train home went from 1640 a few years ago, to 1642, then 1645, then 1648 and now its 1650. They run a service from London which instead of going through to Swansea goes back to London at rush hour, so the most crowded and busy time of the day and they are removing services. If I miss the 1650 for whatever reason, the next train home is 1800.

Year on year the fare has increased from £6.20 return to £9.30 return with no investment in the network or the rolling stock. The train station I get on at is a mainline station and in 3 years, there has never, and I mean NEVER been a cleaner. They open the doors, they shut the doors. Thats it. The station is a shambles and it shows how little care or pride is expended.

The signal idiots that put the barrier down for 30 minutes while they go outside for a fag break or put the kettle on causing you to miss your train, the loud and obnoxious staff who man the stations and the constant mickey taking leave me a sad bunny. All first world problems I know, but my god I feel like having a falling down moment most days.
 
The London to Swansea uses 30 year old trains and spend no money on them.

They are some of the best trains in the world (it remains to this day the worlds fastest diesel train - a record it has held for years) - and it's not true that they 'spend no money' on them because they were completely refurbished inside a few years ago. Pointless wasting money on shiney new trains (Which are inevitably compromised in the name of cost saving) when a refurbishment of a world class fit for purpose train is sufficient. Plus you can hardly moan, Swansea is about to get literally billions spent electrifying the entire route to London complete with all new trains!
 
Last edited:
So I travel to London every day on the Brighton line and so does my wife. We must pay around 700 per month between us to travel in 2nd class and have to fight for a seat daily inside packed usually un air conditioned trains that on parts of the journey to London the train crawls.

Almost every other day we have problems on our journey due to various signal failures and broken down trains and yet year after year the train fare goes up.

For years I have heard a plethora of politicians bang on about the railways being underfunded for years and investment is needed, hence why fares need to be increased. I dont however seem to see any improvements. Therefore where does all the money go? Are we paying for some chairmans fat payrise each year? They go on about constant upgrades and improvements going on, but when will we see them? 20 years time?

Countries like Germany seem to run a perfect system with no delays as the trains seem to be in a worse state than ours..

Posting this whilst yet again we are sat outside a station on a red light.

No your paying for jobs we do that cost a packet to deliver,there is a hell of a lot of work going in the infrastructure that you simply don't see as you will be tucked up sleeping.i spent 5 years upgrading the west coast main line to get the speeds we are at today,it takes a lot of time to do certain jobs,some more challenging than others but it's got to be right.
 
From my recent experience doing a fair bit of travelling the service is just fine, it's the cost that's the problem.

Shorter journeys the cost is great though, £1.80 return and 12 mins to get into town rather than £3.80 and 30+ mins on the bus :eek:
 
damn i hate trains. Absolutly no plus points compared to a car if you regularly travel! actually gets me mad just thinking about it

Only taken a train once in 5 years cause had to pick up a car
 
[TW]Fox;22430624 said:
They are some of the best trains in the world (it remains to this day the worlds fastest diesel train - a record it has held for years) - and it's not true that they 'spend no money' on them because they were completely refurbished inside a few years ago. Pointless wasting money on shiney new trains (Which are inevitably compromised in the name of cost saving) when a refurbishment of a world class fit for purpose train is sufficient. Plus you can hardly moan, Swansea is about to get literally billions spent electrifying the entire route to London complete with all new trains!

I'll feel relieved it holds a world record when Im sitting in yet another broken carriage with non working doors/toilet/peeling paint :p

As for the electrification, it is a waste of money. The only place on that whole line that the train can achieve 125 mph is between London and Reading. After that, its 90mph between Swansea and Bridgend, going lower in places.
 
I'll feel relieved it holds a world record when Im sitting in yet another broken carriage with non working doors/toilet/peeling paint :p

They are the same trains I use regularly on a different line and broken carriages are very much the exception :p As you'd expect for a fleet which underwent complete internal refurbishment only a few years ago. I think you are exagerating somewhat to make your point.

As for the electrification, it is a waste of money. The only place on that whole line that the train can achieve 125 mph is between London and Reading.

Not true, it's signalled for 110-125mph (usually 125) right through to Bristol Parkway!
 
Last edited:
Why in the world would you pay +£700/month to commute, unless your job pays for it. Can't you add it to what you pay for rent/mortgage now and rent/buy in London?? It's madness.
 
Why in the world would you pay +£700/month to commute, unless your job pays for it. Can't you add it to what you pay for rent/mortgage now and rent/buy in London?? It's madness.

I've briefly looked into it, but we'd have to exchange our 2 bed house for a flat (if we were to move into a 'niceish' area).
 
[TW]Fox;22430272 said:
Try using the trains elsewhere in the world - other than Switzerland. In isolation our service may seem bad but comparatively speaking it really isn't. As for crowded trains - name me a single city in the world that doesn't have packed metro-rail commuter services?

There is almost nowhere on the planet where you can commute to the capital city by rail and the train not be crowded.

Also, use Southern and not First Capital Connect and you can have AC ;)

Speak for yourself! I get a seat 99% of the time I board my train too and from London, there are usually a few spare seats as well and I'm the last stop before London. The train has been cancelled about two times in 9 months and at max it's usually a minute or two late. For those cancelled trains I just wait until the next one 5 minutes later...

I come in to Kings Cross though... I heard loads of horror stories about packed commuter travel, haven't really found any of that yet, although there is one slower train that is always packed, which is why I get the one just before or just after.
 
There are a number of factors; it's the oldest rail network in the world, decades of underfunding and underdevelopment; Network Rail and the individual operators blaming each other rather than accepting their shared responsibilities and as mentioned above, it's run for profit but heavily subsidised by the government.

In fact, according to Radio 4 recently, the tax payer now spends more subsidising the rail network that it did before it was privatised (even accounting for inflation).

It's an utter joke.
 
[TW]Fox;22430272 said:
Try using the trains elsewhere in the world - other than Switzerland. In isolation our service may seem bad but comparatively speaking it really isn't. As for crowded trains - name me a single city in the world that doesn't have packed metro-rail commuter services?

There is almost nowhere on the planet where you can commute to the capital city by rail and the train not be crowded.

Also, use Southern and not First Capital Connect and you can have AC ;)

Apart from Switzerland, France, Germany, Austria, Scandinavia, Japan, etc., etc.
 
M23 into London? Ick. And then pay 2000 pounds a second to park?

Oh, so perhaps the train isn't so bad afterall?

Apart from Switzerland

Yes, apart from them.

, France, Germany, Austria, Scandinavia, Japan, etc., etc.

Japanese trains are infamous for overcrowding - they even have guys with sticks to help wedge more people in! Never travelled on a rush hour S-Bahn train in Berlin then? Never travelled in 2nd class in France then?

I've travelled by train in almost every country I've visited and frankly I think there is far too much 'grass is always greener' going on.
 
Back
Top Bottom