When are you going fully electric?

Simon said:
How are batteries incredibly efficient ? 300kg of batteries are needed to cover the distance of 40kg of fuel. And that’s ignoring motor vs ICE efficiency.

A typical battery is 0.3MJ/kg. Petrol 44MJ
Click to expand...

You are confusing efficiency and total potential energy and potential energy per kilo. They are all very different things. Yes petrol has way more potential energy per kilo but creating it and using it is incredibly inefficient. You lose huge amounts of that potential energy through the extraction, refining, transportation and combustion of that fuel.

Think of it this way, 1 US gallon of fuel has approximately 33kWh of energy and gets the average american car 35 miles. 33kw in an electric car will go over 130 miles in something like a Kona, Ionic or Model 3 and over 100 miles in something like a Model S. This also completely ignores the extraction, refining, transportation and combustion of that fuel. Electricity generation and battery charging is considerably more efficient than producing petrol.

https://cleantechnica.com/2018/03/10/electric-car-myth-buster-efficiency/
 
Simon said:
How are batteries incredibly efficient ? 300kg of batteries are needed to cover the distance of 40kg of fuel. And that’s ignoring motor vs ICE efficiency.

A typical battery is 0.3MJ/kg. Petrol 44MJ
Click to expand...

MJ/kg is the specific energy held by a battery. It has nothing to do with efficiency.

On efficiency, there is absolutely no contest. EVs are in a completely different league to petrol or diesel.
 
What is ‘battery efficiency’ then ? I am quoting you. In the context of a vehicle is it not weight efficient way of storing
 
Simon said:
What is ‘battery efficiency’ then ? I am quoting you. In the context of a vehicle is it not weight efficient way of storing
Click to expand...

efficiency
/ɪˈfɪʃ(ə)nsi/
noun

The ratio of the useful work performed by a machine or in a process to the total energy expended or heat taken in.

0eKMnxL_d.jpg

Electric cars use considerably less energy to travel the same distance. That is efficiency. Internal combustion engines aren't very efficient at all; the vast majority of the energy present in Petrol is simply wasted.
 
Oh dear I seem to have made one comment earlier about the energy density of fuel and now we end up comparing Electric motor vs ICE efficiency as some sort of battery proof point.

Batteries are rubbish energetic storage devices compared to liquid fuel. However I see this post could be argued so I will suceed in advance as generally apples are more green than oranges.

Ps your chart above seems to look at getting crude oil out of the ground but completely ignores battery manufacture and raw material mining. It’s also rubbish as it can’t decide if it should be talking about petroleum or gasoline (petrol in the U.K)
 
Simon said:
Oh dear I seem to have made one comment earlier about the energy density of fuel and now we end up comparing Electric motor vs ICE efficiency as some sort of battery proof point.

Batteries are rubbish energetic storage devices compared to liquid fuel. However I see this post could be argued so I will suceed in advance as generally apples are more green than oranges.

Ps your chart above seems to look at getting crude oil out of the ground but completely ignores battery manufacture and raw material mining. It’s also rubbish as it can’t decide if it should be talking about petroleum or gasoline (petrol in the U.K)
Click to expand...

Ok. We'll go bigger. Life-cycle vehicle analysis:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjADegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw2X_SnVumXjL8QVF0Sado_n
 
I still said energy density of batteries is miles away from fuel. Petrol stations at full wack are like a power station.

I’m not sure why people are making other points to argue with now. I was simply highlighting a fact that I found interesting when I first heard it and it shows how much needs to change for EV to mass adoped.
 
Simon said:
Why have you used a life cycle analysis of a car production as a response to the life cycle analysis of a battery vs fuel. Or have you realised batteries are not an efficient storage device of energy?
Click to expand...

You're still mixing up efficiency with energy density and specific energy.

I know batteries cannot store as much energy by weight, or by volume. I am not arguing the contrary. It's you that keeps switching terms every other post.

The primary disadvantages of EVs are range and refuelling speed. Both relate directly to specific energy. But that isn't efficiency. Weight is a factor of efficiency, but nothing more.

Simon said:
Why have you used a life cycle analysis of a car production as a response to the life cycle analysis of a battery vs fuel. Or have you realised batteries are not an efficient storage device of energy?
Click to expand...

Because that's a like-for-like comparison. Petrol to Battery & Electricity isn't. Why would you factor in the main source of pollution and inefficiency from an EV drivetrain and ignore the same from a petrol car?

Petrol is 100% efficient, if you never burn it. But stick it in a car, and around 5/6ths of the stored energy is wasted.
 
Last edited:
Jonnycoupe said:
Page 24 has a Honda Insight plugged into the grid with an ironic “I drive a clean car”. Oh dear.
Click to expand...

You missed the joke then I take it? Look again.

It's a drawing of a car that's connected to an oil power station, spewing out pollution, with the caption "I drive a clean car".

The source of that study isn't pro-EV. It's a research group representing European oil producers. Far from being propaganda, it was intended as advice to the oil industry on how seriously they should take EV environmental claims.

While found via Google, it's the specific document that I was looking for rather than just a random one I stumbled across. I could have gone with a source like The Guardian or Electrek, but both are too easy to dismiss as being partial.
 
Last edited:
Exactly I expect accuracy. Atleast chose a plug in-hybrid not arguably one of the cleanest self charging hybrids on planet earth. I’ve had one just like that for the last 10 years.

I did get the joke, my use of the English language allowed me to use the word ironic to highlight the joke without needing a sentence to explain it...

Doesn’t matter if that EV is not clean, it can get cleaner as power stations are upgraded and grid mix changes. Unlike any ICE.
 
Jonnycoupe said:
Exactly I expect accuracy. Atleast chose a plug in-hybrid not arguably one of the cleanest self charging hybrids on planet earth. I’ve had one just like that for the last 10 years.

I did get the joke, my use of the English language allowed me to use the word ironic to highlight the joke without needing a sentence to explain it...

Doesn’t matter if that EV is not clean, it can get cleaner as power stations are upgraded and grid mix changes. Unlike any ICE.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. But it's not like they drew the image; the source is in the bottom right corner. Personally, I just saw a car, and I think it's perfectly plausible that the author(s) saw the same, or simply thought is was humorous.

It's fairly inconsequential to the findings of the research though. There's no shortage of studies like this, all coming to the same conclusion; EVs are cleaner and more efficient than the existing fleet of motor vehicles. The trade-off is range and refuelling speed (the primary areas that manufacturers are currently concentrating on).
 
Simon said:
The detail is what matters in studies like these though
Click to expand...

Want me to source a different study that states the exact same thing? There's no shortage of them.

Or shall we just accept that a stock image in a report is inconsequential to the findings of a study?
 
Thing is. If people try and prove something by just throwing a lid of info over the fence them I’m inclined they don’t understand it or can’t be bothered to summarise.

Ultimately EV future needs green power to work. But what if that green power could go into a liquid instead
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom