The soggy bottom is obviously a 'risqué' double entendre but was relevant to the conversation about what was being cooked at the time.
Hope not, hes more suited to the joke aftershows than the main event.Tom Allen will be the bookies favourite I'm guessing. Since he is on absolutely everything else.
It's different the other way around though isn't it.Ulrika can't talk. She openly groped Gareth Hale on TV.
Ditch Torode as well and just have Marcus and Monica doing both.I think his replacement should be Monica Galetti. She’s a top chef and a good presenter, and she is already on the professionals series of it, so she is familiar with the job.
"felt very alone unseige"
Ulrika can't talk. She openly groped Gareth Hale on TV.
or old episode of little britain ?
Yeah, I never disliked him, so to speak, but it is entirely believable that he's like that. The double-down and blaming women instead of acknowledging it was all in poor taste are the wildest things I've seen, and one can only assume he hasn't consulted his PR team on that one.He certainly hasn't helped himself by blaming it all on a handful of middle aged women.
That tweeter's comment of 'unhinged' seems a bit hysteria ridden.
However the whole point of TV is to be entertaining - so clearly the presenters are injecting a little bit of humour into it for entertainment purposes.
In this case, it seems they crossed the line of appropriateness, but I'm struggling to see how anyone can say Greg's comment was massively inappropriate, whilst not thinking the same of John's, unless they're just joining in the witch hunt.
I thought I covered that in my reply you quoted, that it can be about patterns of behaviour not any specific incident now highlighted.
I didn't actually watch the clip with this tart thing, is this just being used as an example (like I say not everything is inappropriate) or is this a case where a complaint was made?
Next years BBC line up is going to be a real hoot with any hint of sexual innuendo now being treated as criminality.
and it actually is, there would be a queue a mile round the block to get a grope from "prime" ulrika.It's different the other way around though isn't it.
Yes Sid James, Kenneth Wiiliam and Frankie Howerd would be in trouble I'd they were still around.Oh of course, I'm not passing judgment on any behaviour other than that particular clip, I have no idea if he has any particular track record, or what goes on off-air. It just seemed like a very poor example to use, as both presenters make (IMO) equally as appropriate/inappropriate comments, but only one of them seems to be getting any comeback from it.
I guess re-runs of any Carry On films are right off the cards then
It just shows how many people are such hypocrites though.and it actually is, there would be a queue a mile round the block to get a grope from "prime" ulrika.