Why would I be looking for approval? I'm not the fatty here and I'm perfectly content with my own body fat.YOu are so depserate for other people's approval it's almost comical. Almost.

Why would I be looking for approval? I'm not the fatty here and I'm perfectly content with my own body fat.YOu are so depserate for other people's approval it's almost comical. Almost.
We have more fun.
And are less likely to bang on about your body fat percentage, or ask me to feel your biceps, or a stop in the middle of a riveting conversation in order to do squats.
Makes sense tbh.
I cook a lot but i couldn't make a pile of say 1g of flour, sugar, salt without a scale.
But i could easily make you a fairly accurate pile of 1 tsp of each without an actuall teaspoon
Edit: ok reading the thread i want to see a picture of the guy whos at 4.9% BF on a day to day basis.
Yes, yes, yes, that's all very interesting.
But... HOW RIPPED ARE YOU?!?![]()
Ohhhh well i average around 18%bf most of the time lowest i got was 16%.
Consensus among women is i tend to look better at 18% where I'm a bit stockier.
However men and Malaysian transexuals think i look better on the leaner side.
Shall i go try to find pics with my pants on?
I don't know why but I read that like it was a line from American psycho.
Me too. Bugger!
A teaspoon is also a "real world value", which is why it is important to teach kids the imperial system over the ******** metric system they teach at school.
Why would I be looking for approval?
The following quote is what has motivated me to make this thread:
It has motivated me to make this thread because I personally had no clue what the mass of something that fits in a teaspoon is, yet I know EXACTLY what a gram is. Laugh if you want but I had to Google what the mass of a teaspoon of sugar is. Some sources say it's 4g and some say there's actually .2g extra so 4.2g. That's the thing, a teaspoon is volumetric.
OK fair enough I, as well as most other people, are able to understand relative values, whether it's in grams or teaspoons, I can adapt. But why cater for retardation in the first place? Why not just say "Hey wait a minute fatty, how in the name of **** is the mere abandonment of grams as a measure of mass going to stop you being fat???"
Next the fatties will be saying it's easier to measure meals by the plateload lmao. A pound of steak will be a plateload of steak soon simply due to failures in education as well as the prevalence of retardation.
At this rate, in 100 years everybody will be forced to eat cardboard because fatties gonna fat.
No. Imperial measurements should have been left in 1997 with the rest of the British Empire. I've been trying to buy some aluminium tubing for a project recently, and it's a nightmare, how the hell do you work with stupid numbers such as 0.15748 inches?
Imo a far more useful way of displaying the content would be a graphic of the container with a shaded area showing the relative volume of sugar. E.g. a picture of a can shaded 1/3 of the way up
Who else is getting fed up of some people trying to get the forums to revolve around them?