Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Physx runs in x87 on the CPU, PD has to do x87 in software emulation.............and you were expecting what exactly?
If you want to use CPU Physx go Intel.
I think humbug does
Actually it runs quite well on the Intel chips.
I had no trouble averaging in the 70's on the test with a 3820
CPU Physics
Performing these benchmarks with a powerful main graphics card and a dedicated PhysX card was a deliberate choice, given that a single Nvidia card normally suffers from some performance penalties with GPU-based PhysX enabled. Things would get quite bad in this already-GPU-constrained game. In this case, the difference between CPU-based PhysX on a fast six-core processor with well-implemented multi-threading and a single GPU is almost zero.
Stop trying to draw a conclusion that suits you.
Simple fact.
I used 2 GPU's, ran on AMD average frame rate low 30's
Same 2 GPU's ran on Intel average frame rate low 70'
You have a bottleneck in your GPU that is masking the weakness in your CPU.
I simply removed the bottleneck and allowed the CPU to be tested.
Which after all was your intention.
No, your running two GTX 680's vs my one 7870 and tried to claim your avg FPS were so much higher because it was on an Intel CPU. Its utter garbage.
I just proved it isn't, the proof is in the graphs, anyone with half a mature brain and no agenda can see that as plain as day. your performance increase is purley down to your GTX 680 SLI, its taken the Avg FPS from 3 time more GPU grunt when your CPU is not bottle-necking those GPU's
Other the the high end FPS your PFS are the same as mine (in the Graph)
Get off your high horse kid
I used 2 GPU's, ran on AMD average frame rate low 30's
Same 2 GPU's ran on Intel average frame rate low 70'
Erm.... Humbug..... His post makes it sound like he's used his FX8320 with the 680's too for this.
You know, since he has an FX8320 and says ;
I don't really know or care, has nothing to do with what I posted.
But you went off on the guy for absolutely no reason whatsoever, it's not his fault you're unable to read he used his 680 SLI on both his AMD set up and Intel set up.
How's a 680 SLI and higher clocked 3820 slower than a 2500k and 680? (Your first link).