Associate
1.Hamilton
2.Vettel
3.Button
4.Grosjean
5.Kimi
6.webber
7.Diresta
8.Perez
9.Sutil
10.Kobayashi
2.Vettel
3.Button
4.Grosjean
5.Kimi
6.webber
7.Diresta
8.Perez
9.Sutil
10.Kobayashi
1.Hamilton
2.Vettel
3.Button
4.Grosjean
5.Kimi
6.webber
7.Diresta
8.Perez
9.Sutil
10.Kobayashi
is that list purely because you are a Hamilton fan boy?
he doesnt deserve to be in the top 5 let alone number 1
If team bosses were like Skeeter no driver would ever move up into the top teams must be hard to see F1 in such a black and white manner.
The WDC ranking is the only one used to award and rank drivers consistently. Every other ranking is susceptible to opinion and bias, and will always cause disagreements and arguments, but at the end of the day remain utterly pointless.
The WDC ranking is the only one used to award and rank drivers consistently. Every other ranking is susceptible to opinion and bias, and will always cause disagreements and arguments, but at the end of the day remain utterly pointless.
wdc ranking means very little to anyone whos more than a casual viewer
The trouble is though, it's not a spec series is it? So it's not just a ranking of pure driver talent, it's a ranking of driver talent that is dependent entirely on what car they are driving.
I don't think anyone could sit here and say with a straight face that Webber is a better driver than Alonso, but this year he has been in a better car which has put him higher in the standings.
Whilst you dismiss other rankings as susceptible to bias, ultimately the WDC is too - it's biased by the differences between the cars themselves.
I've never said the WDC is perfect. I'm just saying its the only one that matters. The same thing applies when the whole 'deserving the title' argument crops up. The WDC is not decided by popular vote, its decided by points. It might not be the fairest, or the most objective way to define who is best, but its how its done.
Threads like this are just going to be not stop disagreements, or in this case, just and excuse for arknor and Mr Men to argue with everyone.
di resta beating sutil even though sutil schooled him
Threads like this are just going to be not stop disagreements, or in this case, just and excuse for arknor and Mr Men to argue with everyone. There is absolutely nothing that can be said in this thread that someone else wont argue about. The only ranking completely devoid of personal bias is the WDC rankings, and they were dismissed within about 3 posts...
Sutil has been in F1 for ages and should be beating a newbie driver. Di Resta had a solid season for his experience.
is that list purely because you are a Hamilton fan boy?
he doesnt deserve to be in the top 5 let alone number 1
i dont understand why rosbergs so high up on peoples lists when he only just managed to outscore his teammate who had 3 technical DNFs to rosbergs 0
Schumacher had three 5th place finishes and a 4th place finish this season.
Rosberg only had two 5th place finishes.
yet on some peoples lists rosberg is 4th and schumacher doesnt even get listed