nero120 said:Well considering we've just experienced 8 years of labour hell, I don't think you can blame people if they want a change without having to listen to people harkening back 8-18 years ago. Besides, labour did far more damage than the tories during their 74-79 stint, are you seriously suggesting that people look to past performance as a judge on who to vote for?
nero120 said:If you contribute nothing to the country, why should you get a say on how it's run?
Feek said:I wonder how many people who have said they'll vote Conservative actually remember how things were under the Tories last time. Not many, I'll bet.
K.
nero120 said:I agree that politicians cannot be taken at their word, but it is better to vote for change than let this current bunch of monkeys abuse their power and totally screw this country up. Our economic good fortune will not last forever.
Matblack said:This implies that any change is good change a very dangerous concept
MB
The Mad Rapper said:Spongers on the dole get to vote, so your argument is fundementally flawed
Matblack said:This implies that any change is good change a very dangerous concept
MB
nero120 said:I REPEAT: it was a philosophical question - not practical. Labour wanted to let 16 year olds vote, which I think is absurd. Not only do most (if not all) 16 year olds understand NOTHING about the way the country is run, but most are still in education and not self sufficient. Yet really, since even prisoners are being considered to allow a vote then what the hell! Lets give everyone the vote who is past fetal development!
Rich_L said:I do think it's a bit strange though that you can be a member of the Armed Forces...without being allowed to vote
Er, congratulations?The Mad Rapper said:I served 14 years in the Army. I was never once stopped from voting.
nero120 said:Then leave this thread.