easyrider said:I meant all my upgrading has not been for bragging rights lol
But I have seen the light.
Mobos costing 200 quid are not worth it.They clock no better than 70 quid mobos with current C2D.
This does not make a 200 mobo the best just because it cost the most.
I would argue the best Mobo for C2D at this moment in time in terms of price stablity and clocking is the DS3.
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k224/easyrider_01/conroe3.jpg
Faster clock for clock than the 680i in my experience.And it costs 110 quid less.
Higher FSB with quad cores and C2D both the 2MB and 4MB versions.
The crutch for me was realising that the 200 quid mobo I forked out good money for was FSB limited to 312 on the 680i....and Quad cores...THIS IS A JOKE.![]()
It got me thinking.
I installed the 4300 and 6300 and began clocking getting better results and similar speeds to that of the 6600/6700 again that were costing 100's more.
So price does not mean the best.I have proved this to myself and my wallet has taken a battering in the process...
You live an learn![]()
Well, I agree but I feel your still missing the point. The type of user who will make this upgrade probably will already have a ridiculous setup like dual dell 30" displays with quadcore, 8800GTX SLI, 1000w PSU's and for them its nothing to do with value or bang for buck.. It's just to get the hardware first and brag on forums.
I imagine some will try and reason its part of their 6 months upgrade cycle crap and that there not loosing much from the transition but that’s total BS as we all know.