Shots firedYeah misleading if you can't read![]()

Shots firedYeah misleading if you can't read![]()

Non-lethal onesShots fired![]()

Read the ops link (too lazy to remove formatting from cut and paste):
"Police were scrambled to Levenshulme Station after reports of a man with a gun - but it turned out to be the man's cane which was folded up"
Clearly but you said *it was a folded up walking stick* and posted a giant picture of a military folded up walking stick.
And this is the problem with tasers "its not lethal so i can shoot first and worry about it later"
With real guns at least theres the threat of court reprisals and murder charges to make you think "do i actually wanna shoot this guy"
Clearly but you said *it was a folded up walking stick* and posted a giant picture of a military folded up walking stick.
It's all fun and games when someone just gets a little nip from a tazer.
Let's just hope we continue stay away from arming our police with firearms. Humans are, by and large, total ******* morons - this sort of mistake is just going to happen.
You don't follow news regarding US police then?And this is the problem with tasers "its not lethal so i can shoot first and worry about it later"
With real guns at least theres the threat of court reprisals and murder charges to make you think "do i actually wanna shoot this guy"
The article says he was blind, not deaf, so presumably he heard someone shouting get down and failed to react. I have sympathy for the police in this scenario.
Probably, he heard the commotion but figured it couldn't possibly be directed at him. Not unreasonably - he's a blind man after all, why would the police be getting so animated at him?This was my thinking - why didn't he respond to police?
I struggle to believe the police just sneaked up behind him, whispered "put the gun down" and shocked the poor old boy when he didn't immediately respond to command.
Would have been amusing to watch though.
Probably, he heard the commotion but figured it couldn't possibly be directed at him. Not unreasonably - he's a blind man after all, why would the police be getting so animated at him?
No he hasn't that was one of the others.Well he's received undisclosed sum, so the coppers are in the wrong.
Well he's received undisclosed sum, so the coppers are in the wrong.
Probably, he heard the commotion but figured it couldn't possibly be directed at him. Not unreasonably - he's a blind man after all, why would the police be getting so animated at him?
are you being intentionally obtuse/argumentative?
