1.5 or 1.475v. I fired it up the other night with a spare pair of Corsair 512mb C2 Pro. I want it ready if I decide to let the 2900pro go.
Next time you upgrade Will, don't sell your RAM and CPU. All of these things just lay about for me so I just popped them into a system for a back up as well as building my mum a full system too except from one HD and a case. If you do need anything then you can just buy in the MM as it's not your main system. A cheap but powerful gfx card and your laughing.
I used to play Call of Duty a lot online and got pretty good at it but with all these new titles popping up as well upgrading to the Pro I've not played it in about 3months so I will have something to work at (my aim). At least the 9800Pro will urinate all over that !!.
I thought my 3700+ was a good overclockers, yours dont need as many volts as mine did

Soon the 8800GTX will be the price of a 6200

I've actually noticed since I've been upgrading more I've actually been playing less games, usually when I had my X800/3700+ rig I would game loads, no its about 4 hours a week, I hope the GT gets me back on track and I stop worrying about performance.
So what do you all think about the different driver combinations?. That seems to me that if all the most current drivers were used that the gaps wouldn't be so large. What do you think?. It makes no sense in the slightest to me.
Anyone know what ATI drivers were used?.
Maybe they had some issues, either way I dont believe the drivers will make such a huge performance impact compared to say if it was ATi cards and using earlier drivers, either way it would be giving or taking a few FPS on NV's side so no question the GT is deffenitly faster by quite abit.
Last edited: